Do "invisible" tattoos actually exist? (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 1 week ago by qyron@sopuli.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Some clarification first.

I once read an article on a tattooing technique that supposedly kept the actual tattoo invisible unless the person gets flustered or the skin reddens.

From that, it was argued it made possible for people to get tattoos with very intimate placing and allure, as the patterns would only be visible under very specific conditions.

The article stated a specific pigment was used.

So... myth or truth?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Jerb322@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

My understanding of it is that your, "my", body pushes it out. Like it just sluffs off with old skin. I believe all or most of the ink is gone.

It was a log time ago and I think it only lasted for about 6 months. My skin is fine, like it never happened, though it was very small.

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2025

38 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

49976 readers

445 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS