840
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by sundray@lemmus.org to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 128 points 3 days ago

Clippy moment ๐Ÿ“Ž๐Ÿ’ฌ

Unacceptable. It should be illegal to even build the capability to brick someone else's property

[-] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 24 points 3 days ago

This is a major feature of nearly all cars now. Dealerships can remotely track and disable cars when people fall behind on their payments. That's because so many people fall behind on payments nowadays, they need easy mechanisms for dealing with it. America is cooked.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 13 points 3 days ago

Got to love it. My crappy car doesn't even have Bluetooth, but it does have a CD auto changer. Can't brick my car.

[-] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago

This should indocate to everyone that you cannot rely on any car to work that has this capability.

[-] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

same with the F-35s sold to other countries. and those cost a lot more than even a cybertruck. imagine it being disabled mid-flight. probably entirely possible.

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I mean, that's a tiny bit different. That's something you want to be sure will never end up aiding a terrorist attack against you.

Cybertrucks only kill people accidentally.

[-] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 4 points 3 days ago

as far as I know (which is not a whole lot) terrorists only fly commercial planes. though I'm sure you can probably find the F-35 Handbook on the War Thunder forums.

[-] NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago

That's the great thing: the government then get to decide who or what a terrorist is! - including oil rich middle East countries

[-] 0x0@infosec.pub -1 points 3 days ago

Im pretty sure usaf flies f-35

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 11 points 3 days ago

So here's the neat part! They just make it so that you technically are renting the car and so they can brick it up all they want since technically they own the vehicle!

[-] cole@lemdro.id 3 points 3 days ago

that's not the case here though

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

They'll pull the same crap they do with digital content you "buy." Technically you're just buying a license to use the vehicle, not actually buying the vehicle itself.

[-] cole@lemdro.id 3 points 3 days ago

I don't disagree, but in this case that is not true, because that is not what the terms and conditions say.

[-] harmsy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

You say that, but your avatar is not Clippy.

[-] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Oi! Don't bring clippy into this! He was an innocent clip from a better era! More like a qevlarr@lemmy.world moment ๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿ–•!!

Edit: lol my poor clippy just getting hated on

[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I agree. I was referring to Louis Rossmann's Clippy campaign that we should not accept this as consumers but we want technology to help us, like Clippy

Edit: let's not mass downvote for an innocent misunderstanding, even if they worded it a bit strongly. C'mon now

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago

Those monsters can't downvite clippy, he's being held captive against his will.

Honestly, I kinda want to make a clippy bot, hook it into a self hosted LLM and have it roleplay as clippy trapped by Microsoft. It would be a hoot for 30 minutes or so.

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
840 points (97.5% liked)

People Twitter

7921 readers
1720 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS