840
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by sundray@lemmus.org to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mikezeman@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago

Just wanted to say, huge props for editing the post and title when you found out it was debunked. That's so important and too many people just don't take that step when they learn, so upvoted for that

[-] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

My late friend Robotech_Master once said to me that there are things too bad to be true

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Just one more reason not to buy a Tesla ever.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

And honestly, any of those cars that can be remotely deactivated. I'm shopping now, and I really don't like all the tracking in cars these days...

[-] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

So you’re going to buy a used car

Yup, but I need to be careful on years because newer used cars still have this crap.

[-] candyman337@lemmy.world 412 points 3 days ago

A company being able to deactivate your purchased property is absolutely dystopian

[-] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 68 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Not absolutely, because a company being able to deactivate your purchased property for ulterior reasons is more dystopian.

I also suspect the rapper wasn't exactly praising the cybertruck, so that would add "for ~~insulting~~ misrepresenting? a company". That's even more dystopian.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago

You don't have to suspect anything, watch the video. He's hyping the Cybertruck, hyping, "I'm RICH BEEYOTCH!" This is Tesla trying to distance themselves from that message.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

While that song and message are shit, so is Tesla.

This is peak face eating leopards content all around.

Also I wonder if a white rapper singing the same song would have had his shit-pyramid disabled as fast.

Tesla factories have had a racism problem for years.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[-] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago

Man, if all electric cars can do this bullshit, then I think I'm gonna just be stuck with an internal combustion engine no matter how bad they are for the environment.

Ain't no way I'm gonna get into a vehicle that can be remotely disabled by a jackass.

[-] Cactopuses@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

This isn't specific to electric cars, vehicles equipped with On Star can be remotely disabled in the event of theft (and by extension I imagine a legal injunction). I imagine this extends to other vehicles also.

The real problem is the OTA updates and always-online nature of modern vehicles, not necessarily what powers them.

[-] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

Yes, but I don't have to buy a car with OnStar in it. It seems like every electric car has these OTA features at least in the states. In internal combustion cars that can avoid those features. I'd be more than happy to buy any one of these electric cars if I control the updates and there's no always on connection.

At least w/ OnStar, there are documented ways to disable it, and it's honestly not all that difficult (basically remove power to the OnStar device). Some cars are more integrated, so disabling that crap is a lot more difficult w/o breaking anything important.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 3 days ago

Hey maybe we shouldn't have a world where car companies can remotely deactivate your vehicle if you say mean things about them?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

If car companies can't remotely deactivate your vehicle, how will they be able to extort you and harass you and sell you out to the police?

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 69 points 3 days ago

Imagine:

You have parking lots full of your cars that can't sell because your CEO is basically in the top 5 of horrible humans.

You have horror stories about kids burning alive in the cars because they couldn't open the doors.

You have a Rapper, with social following, in Detroit, Motor City, with a 100k model of your car who makes a song about how you're fucking up, and you shut down his 100k car and send a c&d.

Could you imagine a PR department being this bad at its job?

He could make a music video burning the thing to the ground and make his money back.

[-] glitch1985@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

I thought Tesla fired their PR department?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 128 points 3 days ago

Clippy moment 📎💬

Unacceptable. It should be illegal to even build the capability to brick someone else's property

[-] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 24 points 3 days ago

This is a major feature of nearly all cars now. Dealerships can remotely track and disable cars when people fall behind on their payments. That's because so many people fall behind on payments nowadays, they need easy mechanisms for dealing with it. America is cooked.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

seems like this should go to court - make tesla prove these claims, and explain how they're allowed to stifle both free speech and parody.

because this is absolute bullshit

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 191 points 3 days ago

"Free speech absolutist"

[-] markstos@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

Verge reported there are signs the video may be fix and Tesla posted to confirm that it was indeed fake.

https://www.theverge.com/tesla/757594/tesla-cybertruck-deactivated-viral-video-fake

Tesla's reply: "This is fake – that’s not our screen. Tesla does NOT disable vehicles remotely."

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago

They do though, so thats a total lie. Try getting into your car that you paid for firmware, see if tesla locks you down.

I'll note none of my old cars have this problem. Don't buy new cars people.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 133 points 3 days ago

So stupid. So petty. Elon needs to grow the fuck up.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 81 points 3 days ago

This is a good case to battle the shit out of Tesla in court and set a landmark verdict on the "you buy but don't own" abuse.

Usually this would however require that courts are capable of reaching proper verdicts, that the government actually cared about the people, that consumer protection agencies had any footing etc. Alas, all of them are infiltrated by the big capital corporations.

load more comments (5 replies)

Why is anyone still driving piece of shit teslas

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago

Anyone who buys a fucking motor vehicle that comes with Terms and Conditions agreement, let alone one that can be spontaneously and remotely turned off... you're a fucking moron. And Tesla needs to be sued into oblivion. That shit should NOT be legal.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Honytawk@feddit.nl 61 points 3 days ago

Mr "freedom of speech absolutionist" hard at work I see

[-] Fleur_@aussie.zone 35 points 3 days ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 63 points 3 days ago

This is what happens when you buy a car from a tech company. There is no reason that a Ts&Cs should ever come with a car - but here we are. For now, avoid any company that does things like this. Top of mind are Tesla and BMW

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 days ago

LOL registered previously in your name OR in your possession....

So Tesla doesn't even give a shit if the guy still owns the vehicle, they deactivated it because he owned it at one point in time.

He could have sold it to some poor fuck who now has a bricked Cyber truck and Tesla don't give a fuck.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago

Lol, Cybercucks getting what they deserve. Don't drive a swasticar if you don't want consequences. It was Tesla, this time. Next time, it could just be a citizen looking to enact a bit of justice.

Inb4 douchebags defending their Tesla because they bought it "before Elon was crazy". Your lack of awareness does not excuse your bad choices. Sell your Tesla.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social 21 points 3 days ago

Time for a sequel to "United Breaks Guitars."

"Tesla bricked me truuuk."

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip 42 points 3 days ago

Just looked up the lyrics and it's just Huey saying he drives a cybertruck because he's got money. I bet the only reason Musk hates it is because he's a racist shitbag

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 days ago

These guys are tender.

We talk trash on european cars since ever. Brands and models alike. Nobody cares. And getting a car that was paid for blocked because someone feels the brand is being hurt would trigger a shit storm.

When are you guys going to push Tesla to the bin?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
840 points (97.5% liked)

People Twitter

7921 readers
1617 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS