No, it's not. Organs are hard to come by and the courts have long held that organ donation networks can choose recipients based on the highest likelihood of success including vaccination status. She chose to die rather than getting a safe, effective vaccine. It was her right to make that choice but, like every choice we make, that choice had consequences.

It's definitely sad, but not discriminatory. Organ transplant recipients generally need to take a lot of immunosuppressive medications. Getting fully vaccinated is a bare minimum for improving the likelihood of a successful transplant.

Sad but not even slightly discriminatory. She made the choice and suffered the consequences.

Organs go to those who follow doctor's orders. The unvaccinated are not a protected class.

If you can't even be bothered to get vaccinated, you can't be trusted to keep up with your treatments and meds required for an organ transplant. If she's not gonna trust science and doctors, why should they waste their time and a good donor organ on her?

There's a very high likelihood she would have died if their gave her the transplant without her being vaccinated. A transplant is already a huge stress on a body and if you're not vaccinated, you have a high chance to die from something as simple as the flu or a staph infection, due to all the immunosuppressant meds required.

Edit: Staph not staff 🤦‍♂️

No one is entitled to an organ. She understood the consequences of a choice, and she made her choice.

It only discriminates against people who refuse to take simple basic steps toward self-care.

Stupidity isn't one on the list under which it's illegal to discriminate.

personally I think its fucking hilarious and just

edit: aw the poor cookers feeling upset their deaths are laughed at?

Choosing to make stupid decision about your health is not a base for crying discrimination