128
Are you a feminist? (If so why, if not why not?)
(lemmy.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
128 points (92.1% liked)
Asklemmy
49976 readers
445 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Can you explain how women deal with more inequality than men?
Until 1972, birth control pills were not accessible to unmarried women.
Until 1973, women in most states could not serve on juries in the U.S.
Until 1974, women were unable to obtain a credit card or open a bank account without their husband as co-signer (and unmarried women were entirely unable to have a bank account or credit card).
Until the 1970s, women were not permitted at most Ivy Leagues (e.g. Harvard did not allow women until 1977).
Until 1978, women could be fired for becoming pregnant.
Until 1980, sexual harassment was not considered a form of sex discrimination, and the first legal case where a court agreed a woman was sexually harassed in the workplace was in 1977.
Until 1993, husbands could legally rape their wives in the many states of the U.S.
Until 2010 health insurance companies were permitted to discriminate against women and charge them higher prices than men for the same coverage.
Until 2013, women were not permitted to serve in combat roles in the U.S. military.
One in three women have experienced physical or sexual violence from an intimate partner (compared to 1 in 14 for men).
Women still earn 82 cents to the dollar compared to men, and in 1982 that was 65 cents to the dollar (the situation has not improved since the 90s).
Women experience greater job gaps and unemployment than men.
Only 10% of Fortune 500 CEOs are women.
In 2022, only 33% of university presidents were women.
Women currently make up less than 30% of the U.S. House of Representatives, and 25% of the Senate.
For more: https://www.un.org/en/un75/women_girls_closing_gender_gap
There are a lot of good points in there, the historical part especially highlights good parts why feminism is necessary.
However, studies show that women simply don't want to be CEOs at the same rate as men. Women personally want to be more in domestic/caretaking roles than men. Women want to take more maternal leave than men. Now of course you might try to explain these in terms of existing structures that push women to think like that, but how do you explain that women in "more equal"/more feminist societies actually more heavily lean into these differences?
Have you ever thought about the remaining gender pay gap being because women want to work less, thus having less experience, thus being paid less for less experience? There are studies that, when adjusting for these differences, find that the gender pay gap is actually 1% or less. It then stands to argue that the gender pay gap has not changed since the 90s because since then, for all variables adjusted, women already get paid the same as men. (Logically, if women were paid "too little", in our hyper-capitalistic world, you would see that companies made of women would severely outperform those made of mixed/male workforce, since companies made out of women workers would have severely lower costs. The fact that this is not the case tends to point towards pay being roughly equal. Anecdotally, I personally know 2 women who were unhappy in a "feminism-pushed" leading role and switched to a more classically women-associated work, and becoming more happy as a result of that.)
I love feminism and it is overall a good thing, but the sole problem I have with it is that it wants to eliminate "too much" inequality. Some inequality is desired because men and women are different in some ways. The hormonal mixture is very different, with hormones strongly affecting our behavior. Thus, it is expected that behavior between men and women is different, thus differences should exist. I don't think the work is done for feminism, but I also think it's doing too much/the wrong thing in some places. Obviously, there's also a massive difference between regions in the world, Finland needing feminism much less than idk, Afghanistan.
From my feminist perspective, I want similar pay for similar tasks and experience, so your point could be construed, I think, as reductionist of all feminisms. I don't know any feminist in my circles that would argue that a man willing to do a dangerous job should be paid less to be equal to a woman doing a safer version of the job for example. The problem is that where I'm from, a woman and a man with the same diploma don't have similar salaries for the same job.
For each of those examples women were disadvantaged and men were advantaged. So they both experienced inequality.
Your original question was to ask how women deal with more inequality than men.
Most people use "inequality" to refer to the short end of the stick in the dynamic - when Ada talks about women experiencing more inequality, she means women are more disadvantaged.
So it seems like your question to me was to ask how women are disadvantaged compared to men, but your response shifts the meaning of "inequality" so that you were originally asking ... what, exactly?
Yeah sorry, I meant inequality is non directional. It might seem like I'm being pedantic with language. But I was unsure if you meant that men's experience was more homogenous than women, so women experience more inequality even within their gender. Which I don't think it's the case. There are more male billionaires and CEOs, but also more male homelessness and suicide.
You really missed the point on this one, huh