EDIT: People should stop claiming that the gang of states that are currently engaging in at least one genocide, keep invading everywhere, doing coups is a 'defensive alliance'.

You mean when the largest european democratic movement in decades ousted a Russian puppet

This is silly.
That's quite a fantasy you have concocted there.

Firstly, just describing any pro-NATO movement, i.e. a movement that supports literal colonialism, as 'democratic' is extremely silly. Especially when such movements are known to be created by NATO and include literal politicians and open nazis. Going to also note that you are fine with the perpetual dictator Zelenskiy.
Secondly, everybody is familiar with things like the leaked correspondence between USian representatives in Ukraine picking who gets to be in what position in the new government weeks before the completion of the coup, as well as them bragging about how much money they spent on subjugating Ukraine.
Thirdly, you can't even name what was supposedly so bad about Yanukovich. It's pretty obvious that his sin - in your eyes - was that he did not sell Ukraine off to NATO.

who refused to pass a bill ratified by the Ukrainian Parliament?

Oh no. An elected president vetoed a bill that was being protested against by the same people that you love being in power.
Mind sharing why an elected president vetoing a bill justifies NATO completing yet another coup? Sounds like your standards are very much not applied uniformly.

This never happened.

This is, again, silly.
Do you want to tell us that Ukraine was not trying to join NATO in the years 2014-2022, and that no relevant claims were made by NATO?

NATO is a defensive alliance.

This is also very very silly.
Nobody can seriously claim that invasions of Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, Palestine (complete with a very obvious genocide), Libya, Vietnam, Laos, Korea, etc. - all done by NATO - were 'defensive'.
The only 'defensive' thing about NATO is how it protects its members from facing justice for centuries of ongoing colonialism, including for settler-colonial and other genocides.

The closest it's ever gotten to starting a war was Afghanistan and not every member participated.

Between Iraq and Afghanistan, there is not a single de jure member of NATO that did not participate. And those were very obviously wars started by NATO, with NATO invading those countries.
There is also the fact that not every glorified USian province sending troops neither makes those non-NATO actions, nor negates other forms of complicity in the activities.

And before you wind up the next "gotcha", there are lots of dog shit imperialist countries in NATO, but we're discussing the organization itself here.

If every member of this organisation is a 'dog-shit imperialist state' - and they all are, - then we can conclude that there is no defense that can be levied for the organisation itself that is the most prolific invader in the world and that is currently engaging in at least one high-profile genocide.

Georgia, Chechnya, Syria, Afghanistan?

This is also silly.
Russia did not invade Afghanistan and Syria. Russia literally helped Syria against your invasion forces and DAESH (which has since become yet another de facto part of NATO, if it ever wasn't).
Russia fought against the separatist in Chechnya with NATO's support. The part of the Russian government that supported the separation of Chechnya were shelled with tanks by pro-NATO forces.
Georgia was literally the one that attacked the Ossetian separatists. This is doubly silly, considering that you support Chechen separatists.

And also this is your moral foundation? It doesn't matter what crimes Russia is committing so long as they never commit more crimes than the US?

Again, the rest of the world has every right to defend itself from NATO. Look at what you did to Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Palestine. On what grounds should the rest of the world just roll over for you?