132
submitted 1 week ago by DwZ@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kassiopaea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I could take a picture of my truck that's governed to 90mph and one of those overpowered ebikes that only have pedals for regulatory reasons (that people ride dangerously on bike/pedestrian paths all the time) and ask the same thing. Don't get me wrong, I hate our society's dependence on cars, but this isn't making much of a point.

[-] astutemural@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I suggest you look up the number of peopls killed evey year by bicycles and compare it to the number killed by pickups. I'll wait.

[-] IllNess@infosec.pub 0 points 1 week ago

His idea of dangerous is scratching his precious truck, not people's lives. Hope that clears it up.

[-] flandish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

90 is too fast.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The regulatory reasons are actually what the speed limit on bikes is about. Lots of places, once you're powered and going over 20mph they become motorcycles, meaning they can only be used on roads, require blinkers, brake lights, horns, registration, licensing, insurance, etc.

So the manufacturers have the motor cut off at 20mph to keep them classified as bicycles.

[-] kassiopaea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

That's assuming they're actually limited, or that the limiter isn't trivial to bypass. There are a lot of them where I live and it makes trying to use the bike path frustrating sometimes. Regulation is spotty and enforcement is almost nonexistent in most locales.

[-] brown567@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I dunno why you're getting downvotes, I built my own e bike from a kit, and the speed limiter was enabled via a jumper that was uninstalled by default. Pedal assist was also completely optional. The thing could go 45mph (about 70km/hr) on level ground

I never rode it in pedestrian spaces though, as it would have been very unsafe to do so

[-] kassiopaea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago

Because I outed myself as one of "those people" who dare to own a truck for literally any reason, probably.

What kit did you use? I'm looking into building a capable ebike with my friend who needs to replace a car they can't afford and something slow would be unsafe on the highway we call a main thoroughfare between them and where they work.

[-] brown567@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I can't really recommend the kit I used XD

It was just about the cheapest 1kW model I could find on eBay, and I'd fully Theseus-ed it within a few years because all its components were crap

[-] IllNess@infosec.pub 0 points 1 week ago

Question for everyone, if I, in the unlikely event, go over 20 mph on a bike lane using an nonelectric bike, can I get a ticket?

[-] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Kinda depend on where you are. In my country the cop rightfully doesn't care, as long as you don't cause problem.

[-] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I can't speak for the whole world but in Sweden if a bike goes over the speed limit you get a ticket. That's if the cops somehow notice or care.

[-] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

at least once somewhere in the world in the past it was ruled no because you don't have a speedometer

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

More likely you will still get a ticket but be able to use the above excuse in court.

[-] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Sacramento ticketing for speeds over 15mph:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrdkc7I5o2g

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Why do people ride bikes on pedestrian areas?

[-] rainwall@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

Because the car areas are too dangerous for them and there are no bike areas.

Bike lanes are car infrastructure

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

You could and you’d be making a similar point to the OP: cars are far more dangerous and have governors only to protect the engine from damage, not to protect people.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

While I think they're being a dick, you're wrong about the purpose of governors - they're also there to prevent the loss of handling that results from low speed tires / low power power-steering being run beyond their rated capacity (and historically to prevent blowover crashes, which is only really a risk to trucks anymore)

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
132 points (96.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

13038 readers
351 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS