176
submitted 2 years ago by trexman@sh.itjust.works to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago

…. What are they screening for?

I mean, you know. If they’re like anxiety dogs, and they give out cuddles….

(Who am i kidding this is Florida.)

[-] ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 years ago

I know you're kidding, but you touch on a very real point that I think will pass unnoticed by many. You know that this will be in predominantly poor schools. Schools that are attended mostly by people of color. I'm reluctant to make generalizations, but I have encountered far more children of color afraid of or anxious around dogs of any size relative to white children. I don't know all the reasons why, but my gut says to blame the use of police dogs against people in their neighborhood, in their families, and people on TV that look like them. Maybe my experience is anecdotal and my experience is not the norm, but I no longer assume that all children will be friendly with or calmed by interaction with a dog, even a very calm friendly dog. Having grown up with dogs, it's hard to empathize with that, but I try to be sympathetic. These dogs are only there to instill fear in kids from a young age and to train them to abdicate their dwindling rights to the people in power.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

You’re right of course.

Maybe we should used trained rabbits. Can you train rabbits?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Even white, privileged kids can be afraid of dogs. My daughter's friend, who is white and at least middle class, is terrified of our dogs. She won't come over to our house.

Admittedly, one is 60 pounds, but the other is only 15 pounds and is basically a cuddle machine. She's terrified of both of them.

[-] ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

I don't disagree with you in fact, but this comment is what-about-ism and arguing a straw-man since I never claimed privileged kids couldn't be afraid of dogs. As a result, it comes off a little racist, regardless of your hopefully we'll meaning intentions.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I wasn't criticizing you, I was just adding to what you said.

[-] trexman@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

Ammunition and firearms, according to the police.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Uh huh.

If they could train dogs to rat out lgbtq kids they probably would.

[-] EnderofGames@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

This was actually my original thought :/ It should be a joke, but then again, so should drug searches.

[-] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

Such an idiotic move. If a kid already had a gun in their possession but they weren't yet sure if they should actually do any killing, having a cop come toward them with a weapon-sniffing dog that will get them in huge trouble will almost definitely cause them to panic and actually start shooting.

[-] Melody@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago

This is, unfortunately very likely. Worse is that this won't do anything to stop kids from doing what they do. It will just lead to more situations where a kid is probably going to be very harshly punished when no harm was actually done, no drugs were consumed, and no weapons were used.

But now; with this randomized dog screening; there are going to be more incidents than there would normally be. Kids will bring illicit materials, objects and substances to school for many reasons that don't involve using them. Some of the time they just want to look or seem cool, edgy or rebellious and they don't actually realize the gravity of what they're doing.

[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

But isn’t every good kid with a gun a solution against a bad kid with a gun? /s

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 years ago

god if only the dogs would completely misunderstand and maul the police for handling guns

[-] Jajcus@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago
[-] elouboub@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

DeSantis personally entering the classroom and screaming "UNACCEPTABLE!!!!"

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

well, he would if he could read.

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
176 points (97.3% liked)

News

36412 readers
477 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS