73
submitted 1 year ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/space@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wahming 33 points 1 year ago

You could have read the article. It's based on technical skills, social situations. Not long term population growth.

[-] ApeNo1@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

For me it is the terminology. I thought colonisation was the long term goal of staying more permanently vs a mission which is for a finite period such as this simulation. Had not seen the 28 year limit which makes it more a mission than colonisation. Happy to be corrected.

[-] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

yeah, but then the headline would not be so clickbaity and attracted less clicks than this "new alabama" suggestion. what are you not getting there? it wasn't mistake ๐Ÿ˜‚

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
73 points (100.0% liked)

Space

7242 readers
1 users here now

News and findings about our cosmos.


Subcommunity of Science


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS