87
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2025
87 points (97.8% liked)
Technology
39604 readers
241 users here now
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
CUDA is not equivalent to AI training. Nvida offers useful developer tools for using their hardware, but you don't have to use them. You can train on any GPU or even CPU. The projects you've looked at (?) just chose to use CUDA because it was the best fit for what hardware they had on hand, and were able to tolerate the vendor lock-in.
CPU yes. GPU no, in my experience.
I'm not saying you can deploy these in place of Nvidia cards where the tooling is built with Nvidia in mind. I'm saying that if you're writing code you can do machine learning projects without CUDA, including training.
For sure you can work around it. But it's not optimal and requires additional work most people don't feel like putting in.