84
Language (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

We really really need an open OS for mobile phones that is actually competitive with commercial offerings.

[-] troed@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago

I don't think the OS is the problem - it's that some of the critical service/apps people rely on (government ID, banking) only exist for the closed systems. Third party OS's try to "solve" it through various container approaches running the official apps, but since they see that as a security problem it's not something you can fully trust to be working at all times.

[-] qqq@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think they're both pretty big problems. An open OS and hardware that supports it seems to be a huge hurdle, but at least there is a clear vision of how to solve it. The problem you bring up though... It seems like we've almost gone too far at this point and it's gonna be really hard to put the cat back in the bag. It seems like something we need to solve with legislation potentially?

[-] brisk@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

The people writing the legislation are the same people who don't see a problem with a government-furnished app using Play Integrity

[-] qqq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes there is a general ignorance to this problem among law makers, in my country at least, as well as a bit of regulatory capture with respect to tech in general. The boogie man of "security" is also a very persuasive concept for a lot of people. This is not a problem that will be solved easily.

[-] MBech@feddit.dk 1 points 1 month ago

That's the only reason I'm still on android. If I install a different OS I won't be able to login to do anything government related. I won't even be able to pay with my credit card online. I could get a physical code device from the government, but I'm not gonna lie, I really like the ease of access of having an app for that stuff, instead of a seperate device I have to have on me at all times.

[-] gens@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago

All those "apps" are websites. You could say NFC is special, but so is gps.

[-] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 4 points 1 month ago

Exactly. Locking basic services behind apps should be illegal. Services must be accessible to everyone.

same goes for the weather app ...

(context: some years ago they locked the publicly-funded german weather service's API, so common people can't access it anymore. you need to use a spam-ridden app to access it now.)

[-] qqq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yea.. Like some of those parking applications. Ugh.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Doesn’t android allow this?

[-] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

That's what the OP is referring to: Google just announced they will do their best to kill off sideloading.

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
84 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

9372 readers
529 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS