152
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] randint@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

I am not deliberately starting shit. All I'm doing is engaging in discussions by leaving replies to comments I don't agree with. From my observation, this is also what many Hexbears are doing. When Hexbears do this, it's fine because they "don't have downvotes" and "have been very active for 3 years." When I do this, apparently I am "deliberately starting shit."

I am well aware of the fact that my post and comment history is public.

I did not defend the apologia by Zenz. You are deliberately misinterpreting my words. What I said was although his apologia were unacceptable, that does not invalidate his opinions on other topics. To make it extra clear, I did not defend the apologia by Zenz. I also do not condone what the Nazis did. What you said in your comment is slander and hurts my reputation. I would like to politely request that you take down the allegations.

Though Lee Teng-hui did deny the Rape of Nanking, the "war crime denier" was the first democratically elected president of Taiwan, which makes him one of the pivotal figures in the history of Taiwan. I certainly don't agree with his viewpoints on the Rape of Nanking, but I still respect him just for the fact that he brought change to the political landscape in Taiwan.

[-] h3doublehockeysticks@hexbear.net 43 points 2 years ago

You are deliberately starting shit, we have your own words on the fact that you post in threads with the aim of making hexbear look bad. Don't even fucking start.

And you can suck my fucking nonexistent nuts, you don't get to start shit and defend nazi apologia then get mad when it's called out.

[-] randint@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Yes, some of my comments are done with the aim of making hexbear look bad. But ultimately what's the difference? You already look bad.

[-] h3doublehockeysticks@hexbear.net 45 points 2 years ago

The difference is that you are a troll and all your calls for civility and so on are rooted in dishonest bullshit. Nothing you say has any value, and you deserve no regard.

[-] randint@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

A Hexbear calling me out for being a troll? Calling my claims rooted on dishonest bullshit? Wow.

[-] Flaps@hexbear.net 38 points 2 years ago

Yes, some of my comments are done with the aim of making hexbear look bad.

This is your previous comment

[-] randint@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago
[-] Flaps@hexbear.net 32 points 2 years ago

You see how you're making it difficult for anyone to take you seriously right

[-] randint@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I believe that outside hexbear.net and lemmygrad.ml there are very few people that would take hexbear seriously

ps. although the political ideology of hexbear.net and lemmygrad.ml is very similar, I get a feeling that lemmygradders are generally more respectful.

[-] Flaps@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago

If

there are very few people that would take hexbear seriously

Then why

Yes, some of my comments are done with the aim of making hexbear look bad.

[-] randint@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Because I am salty and owned. Because I cannot stand seeing the opinions I oppose being so popular among Hexbears. Because I just want revenge. Because I love spreading US propaganda. Besides, can you tell me with confidence that none of the comment replies I got from Hexbear were made with the intent of making me look bad?

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 17 points 2 years ago

its our job to make nazi apologists look bad

Go eat some grass nerd

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Egon@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

Of course they were made to make you look bad, you're clearly not interested in good faith discourse. We want to dunk on you, because you're a condescending little unimaginative impotent weasel

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Egon@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And you believe people are gonna take the idiot that can't even engage with the simplest of refutations of his bogus claims seriously? Lmao

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 33 points 2 years ago

It's funny because calling you out on your dishonest and racist shit is the original source of your grudge against us

Now you come to our site for the explicit and sole reason of starting shit with us

And you act indignant at being called out for your behavior once again and act like you're vnidicated

logout

[-] randint@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

As I have already clarified multiple times, I am not here to start shit. I am here to express my opinions, just like the hexbears do on those news posts on China.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 18 points 2 years ago

A Hexbear calling me out for being a troll? Calling my claims rooted on dishonest bullshit? Wow.

And how does this comment fit into that objective? Because this looks like you engaging with and in shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Egon@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago

You have just admitted you want hexbear to look bad you disingenuous idiot

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 27 points 2 years ago

you should stop making ad hominem attacks and instead watch this countdown for an important message then click the spoiler below afterwards countdown

Don't click until the 60 seconds are up, silly!Ad nom on deez nutz ayy lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] randint@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I did not defend Nazi apologia. I did defend Zenz on his opinions about the genocide against Uyghurs in China.

[-] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 26 points 2 years ago

His opinions about the "genocide"? The fact that you recognise that they are entirely opinions and not facts just shows how inauthentic the claims are.

[-] randint@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Not his. Theirs. The opinion of the majority of the WaPo team.

[-] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

That's not what "I did defend Zenz on his opinions" means at all. How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you'll lie about what you said only a few centimetres away?

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

Who gives a shit about some dudes opinions about the misinformation he's spreading?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 years ago

I didn't defend nazi apologia, I just defended nazi apologia.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 36 points 2 years ago

democratically elected president of Taiwan

lmao

[-] randint@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Did I say anything wrong? Was the process democratic? Yes. Was he elected? Yes. Was his title "president"? Yes. Did this happen in Taiwan? Also yes.

[-] Sephitard9001@hexbear.net 22 points 2 years ago

By this same logic, Xi is the democratically elected leader of China but for some reason you keep calling it a dictatorship

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

Taiwan is a fascist colony and democracy is not possible until the junta is gone and western influence wiped away

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

Damn I didn't know you supported the democratic people's Republic of Korea, that's kinda based of you

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] comr@hexbear.net 34 points 2 years ago

Judging by your post history you are definitely trying to stir shit up.

[-] randint@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago
[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 31 points 2 years ago

What's the difference? Your reputation is already shit.

[-] randint@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Hexbear's reputation is worse though. Look at how many instances decided to defederate from you.

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago

you look how many of them are still federated with nazis and transphobes and tell us again how sad it is those freaks defederated

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 18 points 2 years ago

And? There's only like three major instances worth being federated with in the first place.

[-] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

I hold that it is bad as far as we are concerned if a person, a political party, an army or a school is not attacked by the enemy, for in that case it would definitely mean that we have sunk to the level of the enemy. It is good if we are attacked by the enemy, since it proves that we have drawn a clear line of demarcation between the enemy and ourselves. It is still better if the enemy attacks us wildly and paints us as utterly black and without a single virtue; it demonstrates that we have not only drawn a clear line of demarcation between the enemy and ourselves but achieved a great deal in our work.

[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago

No one here cares because they're filled with losers like you. It is a privilege to federate with us. Blahaj was on some transphobic and ableist bullshit, so they lost that privilege.

[-] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 years ago

What you said in your comment is slander and hurts my reputation. I would like to politely request that you take down the allegations.

It's not slander if it's true.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
152 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13932 readers
738 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS