118
submitted 4 months ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] troed@fedia.io 3 points 4 months ago

True, thanks. WIPO has made sure differences between national patent laws, if any, are minor.

What the Law requires for an inventive step?

a patent shall not be granted for an invention where a person ordinarily skilled in the art could have been easily make the invention based on the prior art at the time of filing. Thus, the law requires that a patentable invention should involve such an inventive step that the skilled person could not have made the invention based on the prior art at the time of filing.

https://www.jpaa.or.jp/en/ip-information/patent-others/

[-] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 4 months ago

Seeing as both nations are fascistic, they’ll lobby both judicials to get their way.

This is the case of buyers rewarding the abuser: conmerit emptor.

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
118 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

13841 readers
831 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS