Also recommend reading
https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/fbi-readies-new-war-on-trans-people
The Trump administration is preparing to designate transgender people as “violent extremists” in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s murder, two national security officials tell me.
“We're looking at the entire spider web for any of these attacks,” FBI director Kash Patel
Under the plan being discussed, the FBI would treat transgender suspects as a subset of the Bureau’s new threat category, “Nihilistic Violent Extremists” (NVEs).
White House counterterrorism czar Sebastian Gorka, who prior to Kirk’s murder, despite his prodigious output on X, had never tweeted the word “trans” during the second Trump term. The day after Kirk’s assassination, though, Gorka posted three separate Tweets on X about “trans shooters.”
Back to Erin's article:
On Thursday evening, independent journalist Ken Klippenstein reported that the FBI is developing tools to identify transgender suspects and classify them as “nihilistic violent extremists.” Within hours, the Oversight Project at the Heritage Foundation—the same outfit driving Project 2025’s blueprint now being implemented inside the federal government—released a four-page memo urging the bureau to go even further. Its proposal: formally designate all transgender activism as “Trans Ideology-Inspired Violent Extremism,” a new category of domestic terror threat. It’s important to note that the Heritage Foundation is not itself the federal government, and to our knowledge, its proposals are not yet in place. But the group’s influence is vast, especially in the wake of a Trump administration openly committed to implementing Project 2025. That makes its latest push far more than just a think-tank memo—it’s a roadmap for policy. Here’s what you need to know about the proposal.
The memo’s first section lays out its definition of “Transgender Ideology-Inspired Violence and Extremism,” a term it urges the FBI to adopt as official doctrine. Under its test, anyone who believes violence is justified against opponents of “transgender ideology” would qualify. But the definition doesn’t stop there. It also includes anyone who argues that stripping away transgender rights constitutes violence or an existential threat to transgender people. That second prong is sweeping: by its logic, nearly every transgender rights activist or organization—merely for pointing out the tangible harm that comes from losing rights—would fall under the label of extremist.
What is interesting is that most mass shooters are NVEs or RMVEs^[racially motivate violent extremists — by far the easiest DVE category to target, but for some reason never gets targeted.]. By muddying the category of NVEs, this will assist degrade prevention efforts against those events. NVEs as a whole are an interesting group as they usually don't have a political agenda, but are rather just fundamentally broken people. As conditions in the US deteriorate, more people will break and end up as NVEs. This is going to stifle any sort of prevention effort against those groups and worsen the feedback loop for the coming years of corn syrup.
years of leaded syrup
Years of microplastics
I'm pretty sure there were some studies showing that mass shooters in this category are primarily antisocial disorder, narcissistic disorder salty, seething losers that basically decide to commit suicide and try to take as many people with them, along with a much smaller minority of psychotic ones who commit the act during a psychotic episode and are legitimately detached from reality and incapable of controlling their actions. Mix of capitalist alienation and abysmal healthcare. We should be attributing this type of event entirely to capitalism instead of the liberal blame the weapon/ideology to excuse the system crap. If we're talking about the antisocial narc subcategory then the type of person who'll end up doing this thing becomes this way very early on and long before they acquire any weapons and edgy ideologies compatible with their psychopathy.