251
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not a man (and neither is the bot you're feeding our replies into)

Obviously we already know that the jury didn't convict. That's one of the main things we're criticizing. Pointing out that they didn't convict as an argument to support them not convicting is the definition of circular reasoning.

Find a smarter bot.

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
251 points (99.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13922 readers
805 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS