152
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Egon@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Youve literally been provided with several sources proving there isn't a genocide going on, in this thread.
You have refused to engage with them. Why do you think you're still owed civil discussion or good-faith engagement?
It is not disagreement, it's you refusing to engage in good-faith discussion.

[-] randint@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

None of the sources conclusively prove that there is genocide, and neither are there sources disproving it completely. That of course means that no one knows for sure if the claim is true (except the Chinese government). Feel free to believe that it is false, but I am going to believe that there really is such a thing going on.

You have refused to engage with them.

I have refused to engage with them? That's a ridiculous claim.

it's you refusing to engage in good-faith discussion.

You sound hypocritical. You are not even in good-faith discussion.

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

You are asking to prove an unfalsifiable thing. The sources prove that the camps aren't camps, that Zenz is a liar, that Falun Gong are liarsz that Uyghurs aren't being forced to not speak their language, that Uyghurs are growing in populayion, that Uyghurs aren't kept out of political or cultural posts. Yet you still claim it might be going on.
There is no source that indicates a genocide is going on. The story of a genocide is going on has been proven to be propagated by liars. There is no rational reason to believe a genocide is going on, there is literally nothing indicating one is going on.
You continuing to want us to treat China as if it is committing one isn't based on one shred of fact, but instead because you feel like it might be possible. What you feel like isn't something that inherently deserves respect. It is honestly kind of racist how you keep insisting china is commioa genocide, despite all evidence to the contrary.

I have refused to engage with them? That's a ridiculous claim.

Instead of actually engaging with their content and acknowledging what they say, you move the discussion (as you are doing here) to one about what feel is happening.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
152 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13546 readers
817 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS