29
submitted 1 week ago by Girdy@ttrpg.network to c/rpg@ttrpg.network
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 18 points 1 week ago
[-] Girdy@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 week ago

I wasn't sure whether to use Polygon's title verbatim or take the risk of changing it - I think the interesting angle is that people are still talking about 4e.

[-] Aielman15@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

4e has seen a resurgence among a huge segment of the playerbase that is unsatisfied with 5e's shallowness.

Although I reckon the vast majority of those have never actually played 4e, and only like the romanticization/nostalgic idea of how 4e played. Happens all the time with the gaming community, both tabletop and videogames.

[-] Girdy@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 week ago

I'll admit - I always liked the concept of it. I read it as a game that tried to ensure that every character class had something/a role in combat (or conflict). That was clever. However, it didn't always quite work. My first time through, I played a Warlord but with a too small group there wasn't any real way I could help move, buff or otherwise help allies so I just felt like a naff fighter.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
29 points (82.2% liked)

rpg

4238 readers
1 users here now

This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs

Rules (wip):

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS