Here's a simpler diagram that to me seems to be the same.

All information from this thread:

Valuable chart from leading Chinese Marxist economist Cheng Enfu I saw while doing a pre-read skim of his book, summarizing stages economic development ultimately leading towards communism. Provides a perspective for CPC plans for potential future economic arrangements

For context, the 2049 date routinely cited is when the CPC expects to move from the primary to intermediate stage of socialism

This shows that Chinese Marxists do view abolishing the commodity form and move towards a full planning apparatus as consistent with the goals of a realized communist society.

The book is China's Economic Dialectic by Cheng Enfu. Other books mentioned in the thread are Socialism with Chinese Characteristics - A Guide for Foreigners by Roland Boer and 2050 China: Becoming a Great Modern Socialist Country by multiple authors.

Here is a talk given by Cheng Enfu, Roland Boer and others on modern China.

Some Additional Information:

Product vs Commodity Economy:

He’s using the term “product economy” for an economy that produces products for use and need rather than an economy who’s primary focus is the production of commodities meant for the accumulation of capital

Product-economy as opposed to a commodity economy, i.e. that things are produced in accordance with a social plan to meet real needs rather than exchange-value realization.

State Monopoly Capitalism:

State Monopoly Capitalism is a Leninist term designating Capitalism past its competitive phase.

This latter term is synonymous with Imperialism in its Leninist sense. Finance-capital and arrangements of monopolistic trusts in collusion with State power to divide the world into colonies wherein the export of capital takes on an added significance vis a vis of commodities.

What is a State:

He is using the Marxist definition of a state where its primary function is to maintain the power and position of the dominant ruling class. In a communist/advanced socialist society, class distinctions ultimately fade away, therefore making this form of state power redundant

On China's Current Stage:

Yes they see themselves in the primary stage which corresponds to the current arrangement of the Chinese economy - commodity production and mixed market mechanisms within a dominant state guiding and directing framework

I believe there are various subdivisions within each stage (for planning purposes) which is where the 2030s date comes from

Anyways, I'll probably repost this tomorrow when more people are likely to see this. Just thought I'd share.