Calling it a genocide would be nice. The UN used the term. Everyone in power is scared to say it because of the legal obligations involved.

it's so annoying when critics complain of annoying things like genocide and ethnic cleansing; ugh.

Here's an option.

"We must end this genocide, and stopping any and all funds to Israel, coupled with heavy sanctions and the threat of war is a great start."

Look how concise it could be.

"A ceasefire is a positive first step, but must come with a future where al Palestine is free from the river to the sea."

He never will say something like this because he's in the pocket of the Zionist lobby, but if he said something like that and actually followed up I would be satisfied.

He won't, because it comes with political repercussions, but what he should do is to call things by their names: that this is a bloody massacre, an extermination campaign conducted by Israel with the blessing and sponsorship of the US, while the whole fucking rest of the world was too coward to actually step in, so they looked away.

But instead of demanding accountability, he's washing away the blood and preparing to move on like nothing happened and nobody is to blame. It's disgusting, revolting. The tweet reply is right, Obama is probably one of the biggest disappointments of the generation.

I can't believe they gave the guy a peace Nobel prize, they should take it back.

Edit: you genuinely couldn't think of why people would be mad at Obama? And if you're not one of these "critics" yourself, then where do you stand? Because it sounds like you're sitting on the fence so hard that you have barbed wire shoved up your ass.

@Ging Maybe reconsider that "anarchist" when you're defending imperialist propaganda with that "imperialist Obama can't please the critics here."

@DropBear

Nothing, probably.