1235

Well well well, if it isn't the consequences of my own actions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 134 points 2 years ago

Why chant bring back Twitter, I mean if it was rebranded back to Twitter, it's still owned by Elon and it's still shit.

[-] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 71 points 2 years ago

The new name alone isn't what made Twitter crap, but it is symbolic of the massive changes made to the site by the new management. I like to think of it this way: Twitter is dead. X is the reanimated corpse.

[-] Hiccup@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 years ago

X is modern New Coke. At this point, I'm not even sure which of the worst CEOs I'd compare musk to. He's like all of their worst traits rolled into one. I have no doubt there's some weird financial accounting going on at Tesla, just that they haven't been found out just yet. His involvement into the crypto sphere and with doge should have thrown up regulatory alarm bells already.

[-] IndefiniteBen@feddit.nl 51 points 2 years ago

There's only so much you can say in a chant. Not a lot of room for nuance...

[-] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 years ago

A chant with more words becomes a song.

Now a song about how shitty x is, sang by hundreds, like what football fans do, that would be great to hear.

[-] Piers@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah and the key part would be to get up his nose which "Bring back Twitter" + boos certainly achieves.

[-] ZILtoid1991@kbin.social 22 points 2 years ago

At this moment, I'm staying with my fediverse accounts.

[-] Hiccup@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 years ago

Watching Twitter crash and burn under musk has been so much fun. It being a haven for all the worst dregs of humanity and an advertiser's worst nightmare is just the cherry on top. Old Twitter before mush for brains musk was still salvageable. He's somehow done everything to make it worse.

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure I'd call it fun, but there's definitely something soothing in the thought that no matter how much I fuck my life up, there's no way I can ever make a 44 billion dollar mistake. So there's that.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

I would say specifically because he loves his precious X so much, thinks it's such a great idea, that it's a good chant.

Twitter was shit before Musk bought it. It's just even worse now.

[-] iegod@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago

I think what we really want is to have it restored to pre-musk-ownership level of functionality. But that doesn't make for a nice four syllable group chant. Also I doubt the douche is capable of ever admitting how wrong he was.

[-] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Definitely, that's the best outcome, and also that's the least possible one also.

[-] clutchmatic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

They probably don't care about Twitter - it's just a way to insult Musk because he is obviously invested in the"X" rebranding

this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
1235 points (93.5% liked)

News

36429 readers
1118 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS