1
Squeeky clean (lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago

You're letting the perfect be the enemy of the good. Should they take no positive steps?

[-] palordrolap@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago

Imagine someone robs your house, causes untold damage, takes all your valuables and shoots your wife, your child, and your dog.

The robbers voluntarily give back the clock you had on the mantelpiece and $20, claiming they feel bad. You get nothing else but those things. The clock is blood-spattered and cracked. But hey, that $20 counts for something, right?

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago

Would you rather they kept it?

This is frankly baffling. Nobody is saying this should be the only thing to be done. Just that it's a good thing. Is it not a good thing?

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

If it avoids them suffering consequences for the original theft, thus leading them to the same con again and again and again because they always win from it, it's actually a bad thing.

[-] RoquetteQueen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

If everything from my house was stolen but I was given a tiny useless token back, no, no that isn't better than getting nothing at all.

[-] palordrolap@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago

I'm not saying it's not a good thing, I'm implying how much of a good thing it is.

[-] skye@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Would you rather not get anything because it's not good enough?? you're literally letting perfect be in the way of good

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

20051 readers
347 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS