21

Suppose that following the resignation of a W-2 employee, the employer replaces them with an independent contractor. The contractor does the exact same work the W-2 employee was doing. Would this be a clear-cut case of employee misclassification? Is there any obvious caveat that would prevent it from being so? For the purposes of this hypothetical, assume it occurs in a state with fairly strong labor laws.

Thank you for participating in my thought experiment!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RION@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago

Like if they were to have a specific route starting and ending at a specific time, with various stops to make during?

[-] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago

pretty much misclassification, is my understanding.

the fact that someone else was in the exact role classified as a W-2 wage employee should seemingly make it a slam dunk, if you can get copies of the job description and any payroll paperwork, i should think that's a smoking gun because it shows they know the law and are willfully breaking it. a lot of small business tyrants pull the "i forgot to carry the one" when caught redhanded.

anecdotally, the amount of 1099s in the US that should actually be W-2s must be mind boggling. the only people i have ever known not to have experienced it directly are like fast-track to PMC academics and foreign service weirdos that have only worked government jobs.

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
21 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14200 readers
585 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS