279
KDE Plasma 6.5 released
(kde.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
279 points (99.3% liked)
Linux
57274 readers
749 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Am I the only one who thinks it looks ugly? Don't get me wrong, they are improving it in many ways and it's going in the right direction, plus a ton of features and customizability, but when I look at Gnome I don't doubt for a second where I want to be.
They are two opposite styles of UI.
However, KDE has a fuckton of customization possibilities that I have always been dreaming of in GNOME.
And I'm saying this as a GNOME guy, absolutely zero fanboyism here.
Well, that's kind of the thing, except for a few things I don't want to customize it that much, when I've tried KDE in the past I just customized it a bit and it looked like shit because I didn't spend that much time into it. I know you can make it look pretty, but I'd rather waste that time learning how to use Hyperland to be honest since it's way more customizable and offers something else completely. Except for a better KDE Connect integration I don't think I'm missing anything I would need on Gnome.
I don't think anyone would think you were a fanboy, just beacuse KDE has ton of configuration and customization. That's the opposite of GNOME. I always think of GNOME like Apple, who decides what you can and cannot do, what you are allowed to. I used GNOME 2, then Unity, then GNOME 3 all the way from Ubuntu 2008 to what, 2020 (I forget when I switched to different distro for the first time).
Yeah me neither, from the other side, lol
I also think Gnome is much prettier than KDE but KDE is a fully working desktop environment that does not need extensions to get it to a working state so here I am.
(Although I would not call KDE ugly)
You are not the only one. Its a taste. I personally like the KDE look the most, its beautiful to me. No other desktop environment looks this good.
Yep. Ugly, disjointed in appearance, etc. I set up Debian KDE for a family member moving from windows so it fits. I was impressed that KDE came far from what it was but it very much is like a bucket of bolts to me.
Gnome in contrast is very put together. Yes, has some quirks but appearance wise is very curated IMO.
I'm fairly new and happened to choose KDE for my own taste, but I would argue GNOME is not "fully" polished as per this post. The nits there may be small or mindless to GNOME diehards, but from a design standpoint, they seem pretty... rough.
Way too much for me to care. I admit gnome isn't perfect but I'll still argue it's far more consistent than KDE.
kde is pretty enough, it's not exactly trendy but I feel they're going the best they could do while keeping information density
A colleague always complains that KDE looks like Windows. She does also get jealous, though, when she sees me using poweruser features.