22
Vampire: The Masquerade® - Bloodlines™ 2 released on Steam [mixed review] [Steam Deck playable]
(store.steampowered.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
22 points (95.8% liked)
PC Gaming
12552 readers
644 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
What's wrong with not being able to turn off motion blur being a deal-breaker?
up to personal taste, to me it's mostly about implementation. All motion blur isn't terrible, but when it's terrible, it's really bad. Some older games had really odd stepping in it, or everything had a trailing blur of same length regardless of how fast the objects were moving, or motion blur is calculated at different fps/shutter speed than the game runs so the blur is either too long/short/fucky.
Mostly I'm about the fov being the dealbreaker here. My eyes start to hurt with narrow fov's, feels like I'm straining something somehow. I usually go with something between 90-100, 110 in some rare cases.
edit:
oh, maybe I misunderstood the question: I mean, I agree it's a dealbreaker. Just "FFS"'ing because it's not an option.
Apologies, I misunderstood your comment. :)
Yes, I largely agree, although I generally can't stand motion blur at all.
No worries, my comment was a bit ambiguous.