317
submitted 2 months ago by zdhzm2pgp@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml 63 points 2 months ago

Even those makeup are kinda useless since they can track you to your door, see the cars you got in, the people you met, see if those people posted on social media if they know someone trying anti-facial recognition methods, etc. They can easily make a list of people prone to use anti-facial recognition that lives in or walks by certain areas then recognize them by body-type, height, walking rhythm...

[-] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago

You aren't wrong, but I still see two distinct benefits assuming there is an IR reflective or absorbent coating that can interfere with facial recognition.

  • For non government entities it makes direct tracking of individuals much harder (i.e. if you decide not to carry your phone or smart device any one company probably doesn't know who you are).
  • For government entities it's about making their job harder and increasing the error rate. You are right that they can still track someone via those means, but any time they have to correlate data or use multiple sources it does become more resource intensive in some way.

Realistically will either of the above matter? Probably not. For it to be effective a large portion of the population would need to care about their privacy, or even their principles above convenience, which they usually don't. However, I can't control what other people do, only what I do. So in this kind of situation I do my best to be a good example of the behavior I would like to see from others and do my best to not contribute to the Prisoner's Dilemma or Tragedy of the Commons.

It's not much, arguably it's basically nothing, but it's what I have.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

I would also distinguish between investigations and drag nets. If they're specifically looking into you and your business, then glasses won't help. If they just want to identify 90% of people at a pretes pretest, these may be useful.

[-] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Great addition. That was what was kinda in my head, but I didn't state it explicitly.

[-] evilcultist@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 months ago

Some of those mean the more people that use anti facial recognition tools, the more effective they will be for everyone. So we should probably just encourage everyone to use it.

[-] zdhzm2pgp@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago

They can easily make a list of people prone to use anti-facial recognition that lives in or walks by certain areas then recognize them by body-type, height, walking rhythm…

Which is why everyone should put stones in their shoes, especially if going to a protest. 🙂

[-] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

I'd strongly advise against doing this every day. I developed osteoarthritis in my 20s just from my feet being slightly misaligned. Walking wonky can very easily permanently wreck your joints.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Are you going to protests every day?

[-] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

They just said especially for protests, implying you'd best do it more often than that. Didn't want anyone to take them too literally.

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Even just protest shoes being different style then your normal ones probably make a difference. Different bag loadouts could affect it too.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 7 points 2 months ago

Best thing is to destroy all the cameras near your house.

[-] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

Yeah, It's one tool in the toolbox. and it won't stop all those other things for sure, but products like this can help build awareness of the ubiquitous surveillance we live under. Awareness might eventually lead to policy change. So it's not a bad thing, and the article does describe the limitations and weaknesses.

Also, not for nothing, I saw a test on YouTube (Dr. John Padfield - Business Reform) where his tests showed that IR reflective hats worked better than glasses.

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, you might as well turn off your antivirus and firewall seeing as those can be bypassed by a skilled actor anyways.

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
317 points (98.2% liked)

Privacy

44025 readers
212 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS