85
submitted 1 month ago by Horsey@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

May be a mean sounding question, but I’m genuinely wondering why people would choose Arch/Endevour/whatever (NOT on steam hardware) over another all-in-one distro related to Fedora or Ubuntu. Is it shown that there are significant performance benefits to installing daemons and utilities à la carte? Is there something else I’m missing? Is it because arch users are enthusiasts that enjoy trying to optimize their system?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because it is less trouble.

I read comments here all the time. People say Linux does not work with the Wifi on their Macs. Works with mine I say. Wayland does not work and lacks this feature or this and this. What software versions are you using I wonder, it has been fixed for me for ages.

Or how about missing software. Am I downloading tarballs to compile myself? No. Am I finding some random PPA? No. Is that PPA conflicting with a PPA I installed last year? No. Am I fighting the sandboxing on Flatpak? No. M I install everything on my system through the package manager.

Am I trying to do development and discovering that I need newer libraries than my distro ships? No. Am I installing newer software and breaking my package manager? No.

Is my system an unstable house of cards because of all the ways I have had to work around the limitations of my distro? No.

When I read about new software with new features, am I trying it out on my system in a couple days. Yes.

After using Arch, everything else just seems so complicated, limited, and frankly unstable.

I have no idea why people think it is harder. To install maybe. If that is your issue, use EndeavourOS.

[-] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

yay! Everything is up to date and working better than ever. Manjaro and Endeavour seem okay, too. Sounds like SteamOS 3 will be Arch-based, which would be great news!

Oh, also, AUR is life. And worth mentioning, KDE Wayland, NVidia 3090, Pipewire, and UKI generation. 👌

[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 month ago

SteamOS 3 is arch based but that doesnt mean its anything like arch. It builds from a snapshot of arch and ships that to users as an immutable. So it will be extremely out of date compared to arch.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

SteamOS already is Arch based.

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Wayland is a great example.

Debian user? You may have spent the last two years complaining that Wayland is not ready, that NVIDIA does not work, and that Wayland is too focussed on GNOME. You may move to XFCE if GNOME removes X11 support.

Arch user? Wayland is great and Plasma 6 works flawlessly. There have not been any real NVIDIA problems in a year or two. Maybe you have been enjoying COSMIC, Hyprland, or Niri.

[-] c10l@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I have been using Plasma 6 on Wayland on Debian for way longer than 2 years with no issues.

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Awesome.

Not installing Plasma from the default repos on Debian Stable though obviously.

When I say “Debian”, I mean “Debian Stable” which is what I think most people mean when they Debian without qualification.

[-] c10l@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

That’s ok but it’s a bit cheeky to compare something meant primarily to be used as a stable system against a rolling release.

[-] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

Everything I wanted to say in a single comment.
It really just werks™

[-] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

With how much talk of breaking your install goes around, I assumed it would be a challenge. I run pacman -Syu almost every time I update lmao.

[-] Attacker94@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

On occasion I have broken it to the point that I needed to chroot from live USB, but I just chroot and sudo pacman -Syu a couple of hours later and everything sorts itself out. And even if that sounds like a hassle, I can tell you every issue was hardware, I was running endeavor on a USB (not a live env) which is not something I would recommend, because pacman degrades flash memory integrity very quickly, and the only other times I broke it badly enough had to do with nvidia drivers

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Is my system an unstable house of cards because of all the ways I have had to work around the limitations of my distro? No.

Honestly, house of cards is a good analogon for the whole boot chain.

this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
85 points (92.9% liked)

Linux

57274 readers
312 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS