679
I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
(manualdousuario.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
679 points (96.7% liked)
Firefox
21459 readers
5 users here now
/c/firefox
A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.
Rules
1. Adhere to the instance rules
2. Be kind to one another
3. Communicate in a civil manner
Reporting
If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Using a search engine would be one.
Nope. The "AI summary" is something I disable on Google and I try to actively avoid it because it enrages me. It's total dogshit.
The algorithms to determine which pages are most relevant to your query are traditionally seen as AI too. They're just not labelled as such (which was the point), and predate the current AI hype.
I hadn't even thought about the "AI modes" that search engines are incorporating nowadays though, so I get the confusion.
That’s a fair point. But search algorithms fall under the “recommender system” umbrella, which are a very different family from the agentic AI we’re discussing here.
Both are AIs, but with very different use cases. In the same way, you could technically classify both your gaming PC and phone as computers, and you’d be correct.
Edit: links
It was my impression that the thread started wasn't just talking about agentic AI. And I think a lot of the "anti AI folks" here are also angry about recent non-agentic AI additions that Mozilla added, such as e.g. tab recommendations for tab groups.
The post is about the new AI Window feature, and here’s its description from Mozilla’s own announcement:
So, definitely agentic.
I’ll speak honestly: I’m not happy with that either. But that’s incidental to this topic. The agentic component is my biggest concern.
Hmm could be different commenting styles; I, and I think the thread started as well, regularly broaden a topic in response to an article. So my interpretation when they spoke about people having "AI as a trigger word" was that they were referring to people with concerns about more than just agentic AI. But if you want to limit it to that, feel free to ignore my original reference to search engines.
I exclusively use https://noai.duckduckgo.com/
So no.
See my reply to the sibling comment - I wasn't referring to the "AI summary".