Hey all, just a reminder to keep the community rules in mind when commenting on this thread. Criticism in any direction is fine, but please maintain your civility and don't stoop to ad-hominem etc. Thanks.
don't stoop to ad-hominem
At this point Ad-hominem is practically the nice name for the business model "enshitification".
The more AI is being pushed into my face, the more it pisses me off.
Mozilla could have made an extension and promote it on their extension store. Rather than adding cruft to their browser and turning it on by default.
The list of things to turn off to get a pleasant experience in Firefox is getting longer by the day. Not as bad as chrome, but still.
Oh this triggers me. There have been multiple good suggestions for Firefox in the past that are closed with nofix as "this can be provided by the community as an add-on". Yet they shove the crappiest crap into the main browser now.
Rather than adding cruft to their browser and turning it on by default.
The second paragraph of the article:
The post stresses the feature will be opt-in and that the user “is in control.”
That being said, I agree with you that they should have made it an extension if they really wanted to make sure the user "is in control."
You want AI in your browser? Just add as a "search engine" option, with a URL like
https://chatgpt.com/?q=%25s
, with a shortcut like @ai. You can then ask it anything right there in your search bar.
Maybe also add one with a URL with some query pre-written like
https://chatgpt.com/?q=summarize this page for me: %s
as @ais or something, modern chatbots have the ability to make HTTP requests for you. Then if you want to summarize the page you're on, you do Ctrl+L Ctrl+C @ais Ctrl+V Enter. There, I solved all your AI needs with 4 shortcuts without literally any client-side code.
Just render the page, page renderer.
monkey paw: curls
Yes, the page has been rendered by a large webpage model based on the URL.
Those unhappy have another option: use an AI‑free Firefox fork such as LibreWolf, Waterfox, or Zen Browser.
And I have taken that other option.
Also: Vanadium and/or Ironfox on Android.
A fork is great, but the more a fork deviates, the more issues there are likely to be. Firefox is already at low enough numbers that it's not really sustainable.
Then Mozilla should start listening to their users instead of driving them away. I know I stopped using Firefox after being a regular user since launch because the AI nonsense became the last sta straw.
My two biggest issues with a fork are: a) timely updates, they take a bit longer than the main version, and b) trust issues, I don't trust most forks.
What I don't get: Isn't Vanadium Chromium under the hood?
It is.
My understanding is that you go to Ironfox to optimize for privacy and Vanadium to optimize for security.
It depends on your threat model.
Either way, both are better on both fronts when compared to default Chrome or Firefox.
Hear me out.
This could actually be cool:
If I could, say, mash in "get rid of the junk in this page" or "turn the page this color" or "navigate this form for me"
If it could block SEO and AI slop from search/pages, including images.
If I can pick my own API (including local) and sampling parameters
If it doesn't preload any model in RAM.
...That'd be neat.
What I don't want is a chatbot or summarizer or deep researcher because there are 7000 bajillion of those, and there is literally no advantage to FF baking it in like every other service on the planet.
And... Honestly, PCs are not ready for local LLMs. Not even the most exotic experimental quantization of Qwen3 30B is 'good enough' to be reliable for the average person, and it still takes too much CPU/RAM. And whatever Mozilla ships would be way worse.
That could change with a good bitnet model, but no one with money has pursued it yet.
Why not just distribute a separate build and call it “Firefox AI Edition” or something? Making this available in the base binary is a big mistake. At least doing so immediately and without testing the waters.
There is a Firefox Developer's Edition so I don't see why not? I personally don't care to see them waste the time on AI features.
I think ive lost hope at this point to see AI being actually useful in any application except chat gpt and code editors.
Companies are struggling how to use Ai in their products because it actually doesnt improve their product, but they really really want it to.
I have studied machine learning to an useful level. Based on that it currently looks to me that:
A fine-tuned (for specific purposes) LLM utilising RAG and high quality prompt engineering can make redundant north of 50% white collar office roles over some small number of years of further fine-tuning (post initial deployment of the AI).
But without these techniques LLM's just aren't accurate enough to be deployable on a large scale. Usually these techniques require a locally hosted LLM for one reason or another.
The only sized organisations that it might make sense to use these multi-billion data centres for the above purposes (to get the LLM's accurate enough to be useful) are governments, or huge companies that can pay billions to the likes of microsoft (or OpenAI, or Anthropic or whoever is left standing) to do all of the above on a huge scale.
I might be wrong now, but even if I am not, it is such a rapidly changing technology that in three months this might be an out of date opinion.
I think Mozilla's base is privacy focused individuals, a lot of them appreciating firefox's opensource nature and the privacy hardened firefox forks. From a PR perspective, Firefox will gain users by adamantly going against AI tech.
I am not really liking AI , sure its good for somethings but in last 2 weeks i seen some very negative and destructive outcomes from AI . I am so tired of everything being AI . It can have good potential but what are risks to users experience?
It depends. If it's just for the sake of plugging AI because it's cool and trendy, fuck no.
If it's to improve privacy, accessibility and minimize our dependency on big tech, then I think it's a good idea.
A good example of AI in Firefox is the Translate feature (Project Bergamot). It works entirely locally, but relies on trained models to provide translation on-demand, without having Google, etc as the middle-man, and Mozilla has no idea what you translates, just which language model(s) you downloaded.
Another example is local alt-text generation for images, which also requires a trained model. Again, works entirely locally, and provide some accessibility to users with a vision impairment when an image doesn't provide caption.
When I want AI, I use this: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=DuckDuckGo+AI+Chat&ia=chat&duckai=1
My worry about AI built into my browser is that it'll be turned into data mining, training, and revenue generation resulting in exploitation and manipulation of me.
Doesn't matter what the end-user wants. Corporate greed feeding into technological ignorance is gonna shove it down our throats anyway
ai can be good as long as you don't let it think for you. i think the problem is taking resources from development and building into a browser would could just be a bookmark to a webpage.
why don't they just instead put vivaldi's web panel sidebar into firefox so you can just add chatgpt or whatever as a web panel. i think that would be infinitely more useful (and can be used for other sites other than ai assistants).
ai can be good as long as you don't let it think for you
Unfortunately, there's too many people already doing that, with not so clever results!
If it increases accessibility for those with additional requirements then great but we know that's not even in its top 10 reasons for being implemented
The post stresses the feature will be opt-in and that the user “is in control.”
Nothingburger
I've actually flipped on this position - but before you pull out your pitchforks and torches, please listen to what I have to say.
Do we want mass surveillance through SaaS? No. Do we want mass breach of copyright just because it's a small holder and not some giant publisher - I.e "rules for thee" type vibe? Hell no. But do we throw the baby out with the bath water? Also: heck no. But let's me underline a few facts.
See where I'm going with this?
Add to the fact that people like their chatbots and can even learn to use them responsibly, but as long as they're feeding the corpos, it'll be used against them. Not only that, but in true silicon valley fashion, it'll be monopolized.
The libre movement exists to bring power back to the user by fighting these conditions. It's also a very good idea to standardize things so that it's not hidden behind a proprietary API or service.
That's why if Mozilla seeks to standardize locally run AI models by way of the browser, then that's a good thing! Again; not if they're feeding some SaaS.
But it their goal and their implementation is to bring models to the general consumer so that they can seize the means of computing, then that's a good thing!
Again, if you'd rather just kick up dust and bemoan the idiocy and narcissistic nature of Silicon Valley, then you've already given them what they want - that they, and they alone, get to be the sole proprietaries of AI that is standardized. That's like giving the average user over to a historically predatory ilk who'd rather build an autocracy than actually innovate.
Mozilla can be the hero we need. They can actually focus on consumer hardware, to give people what they want WITHOUT mass tracking and data harvesting.
That is if they want to. I'm not saying they're not going to bend over, but they need the right kind of push back. They need to be told "local AI only - no SaaS" and then they can focus on creating web standards for local AI, effectively becoming the David to Silicon Valleys Goliath.
I know this is an unpopular opinion and I know the Silicon Valley barons are a bunch of sociopaths with way too much money, but we can't give them monopoly over this. That would be bad!! We need to give the power to the user, and that means standardization!
Take it from an old curmudgeon. I've shook my fist at the cloud, I've read a ton of EULAs and I've opposed many predatory practices. But we need to understand that the user wants what the user wants. We can't stick our heads in the sand and just repeat "AI bad" ad nauseum. We need to mobilize against the central giants.
We need a local AI movement and Mozilla could be in the forefront of this, if it weren't for the pushback and outright cynicism people trevall generally (and justifiably) have - but we can't let these cretinous bastards hold all the AI cards.
We need libre AI, and we need it now!
Thank you for your consideration.
I considered using AI to summarize news articles that don't seem worth the time to read in full (the attention industrial complex is really complicating my existence). But I turned it off and couldn't find the button to turn it back on.
If you need to summarize the news, which is already a summary of an event containing the important points and nothing else, then AI is the wrong tool. A better journalist is what you actually need. The whole point of good journalism is that it already did that work for you.
That should be the point but there is barely good journalism left.
How does AI mis-summarizing the (allegedly bad) journalism improve it?
Everyone's entitled to their opinion, but how can you be aware of this fact
I don’t know whether the negative reactions reflect the majority of Firefox users or are just a noisy minority. Mozilla, after all, likely has a clearer view of the whole user base.
and then still assume that nobody wants something based on a non-representative sample of 52 comments?
Well if they do I'll just switch to whatever browser that doesn't.
Those unhappy have another option: use an AI‑free Firefox fork such as LibreWolf, Waterfox, or Zen Browser.
Any idea as to when LibreWolf will be coming out with a mobile browser?
A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.
1. Adhere to the instance rules
2. Be kind to one another
3. Communicate in a civil manner
If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.