82
submitted 5 days ago by otters_raft@lemmy.ca to c/biology@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SamuraiBeandog@lemmy.world 33 points 5 days ago

This article doesn't address the point that modern society enables most individuals to live long enough to have children regardless of their genetic advantages or disadvantages. Sure people with light skin are not well suited to living in very hot climates, but in the modern world that isn't going to make them less likely to procreate than people with dark skin in that environment.

[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Yes, but being an anti-social, shut-in can contribute to not procreating. There are definitely both physical and psychological characteristics in humans that have a better chance of procreation than others. Even if people aren't dying from nature, Darwin will get his due.

[-] SamuraiBeandog@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I'm not saying that genetic changes aren't happening at all, just that the article doesn't address that modern society creates a very different environment for natural selection, compared to humans in subsistence level environments in the wild.

this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
82 points (92.7% liked)

Biology

2938 readers
1 users here now

This is a general community to discuss of all things related to biology!

For a more specific community about asking questions to biologists, you can also visit:

/c/askbiologists@lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS