34
submitted 2 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

As part of their efforts to combat draft evasion, authorities earlier this year launched an electronic register of conscripts to serve online summonses in some Russian regions. They also introduced a series of legal restrictions for those who ignore the summonses, including banning their bank transactions, suspending their driver’s licenses and blocking foreign travel. (AP)

dude I've been reading about the ukrainians running kidnapping squads grabbing kids off the streets for like two years straight but uh yeah sure it's russia having manpower issues

[-] kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 day ago

Whether or not Ukraine has kidnapping squads doesn't mean Russia can't also be having manpower issues.

Both can be true at the same time.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

You can't cite Russian conscription as evidence that Russia is losing and then say that Ukraine also using conscription doesn't matter

[-] kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 day ago

I didn't say either of those things you're saying.

This is what I said :

I'm sure Ukraine is in a similar position, but it doesn't sound like a clearcut win for Russia, either.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

If it's mirrored on both sides, then why the fuck would you bring it up as a reason to think Ukraine isn't losing?

What you're doing is actually moving the goal posts, by the way

[-] kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 day ago

why the fuck would you bring it up as a reason to think Ukraine isn't losing?

I was bringing it up as a reason to think the case for Russia winning wasn't a clear slam dunk.

Resorting to conscription to fill your ranks is not something you do when you're "obviously winning".

And before you make a claim about Ukraine resorting to conscription, too, at no point have I claimed Ukraine was "obviously winning" either.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Why is that a reason, if that particular factor is a wash for both sides?

Resorting to conscription to fill your ranks is not something you do when you’re “obviously winning”.

Uhuh. So when the Soviets were flattening Berlin they weren't obviously winning? When the US had sunken the entire Japanese Navy and were systemically saturation bombing the Japanese mainland, they weren't obviously winning?

this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
34 points (94.7% liked)

World News

38311 readers
432 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS