754
submitted 2 days ago by Maerman@lemmy.world to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

So I just read Bill Gates' 1976 Open Letter To Hobbyists, in which he whines about not making more money from his software. You know, instead of being proud of making software that people wanted to use. And then the bastard went on and made proprietary licences for software the industry standard, holding back innovation and freedom for decades. What a douche canoe.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maerman@lemmy.world 82 points 2 days ago

I read about that, yeah. All hail Mammon; money above all. Sometimes I think wealth changes something in a person's brain, like psychologically or neurologically. It's as if they get so detached from reality that they lose all empathy and sense of community. I've heard the term 'affluenza' used as a joke, but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense as a legitimate thing.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 92 points 2 days ago

It takes a certain kind of personality to even become a billionaire. You don't become a billionaire by being kind and ethical

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 days ago

I think there's research to that effect.

[-] Maerman@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Well, it would make sense. Rich people have always creeped me out, just instinctively.

[-] Townlately@feddit.nl 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm sure the threshold varies, but I would back research that attempts to pinpoint or at least narrow down what amount of wealth starts to change your brain chemistry for the worse.

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago

Its any position of power in my experience. People get power, justifying in their mind that they and people like them should be in power. Even games about being in charge run into that problem. Maintaining power becomes a major part of the game at some part.

[-] Maerman@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

That's a good point, as illustrated by things like the Stanford Prison Experiment.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

That experiment was massively flawed to the point of uselessness.

[-] No1@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

That's exactly what a rich and powerful squirrel would say.

[-] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Also the issue of you need to be a deranged psychopath to get wealthy in the first place.

[-] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

There’s plenty of wealthy people who aren’t psychopaths, but they are all broken in some way. Usually it’s because capitalism has completely alienated them from our natural communal instincts and taught them that the individual is god. Many are capable of empathy, they just choose to do the selfish thing because they’ve been told their entire lives that “taking care of number one” is a virtue.

Of course, the impacts of their behavior are the same as if they were psychopaths, so this isn’t me excusing them. But it’s important to know what capitalism does to people and how it requires us to ignore our natural instincts, because the wealthy (the ones capable of empathy, anyways) are the same as the rest of us, only luckier.

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

as someone who recently escaped the labor trap (that is what capitalists call it...wages are suppressed for a reason...), the shift from needing to work and not is...profound.

no wonder so many rich cunts are batshit psychopaths, nobody born into $ can ever truly know this feeling of relief (and the resulting stress, just from your brain leaving "survival mode"...hierarchy of needs stuff, then realizing just how fucked everything is, how powerless you still are even as new-rich to change anything...)

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
754 points (94.5% liked)

Open Source

42290 readers
1117 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS