298
submitted 5 days ago by ooli3@sopuli.xyz to c/til@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Is the picture to scale in both height and width?

[-] Nanook@lemmy.zip -3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It’s missing 4K, better would be if the buildings were half their current size

Or mountain more accurately depicted in size:

[-] schnokobaer@feddit.org 4 points 5 days ago

Those buildings are at least approximately to scale as those 828 meters fit in the top 4611 meters roughly 5 times. If you made them half as tall it would be all wrong.

[-] Nanook@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 days ago

But you’re only seeing half the mountain.

[-] schnokobaer@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago

So? That's still obviously accounted for in the scale of the buildings. The buildings are roughly 1/10 of the whole mountain but since only half of the mountain is in frame they are 1/5 of what is in view. It's correct.

[-] Nanook@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Except the bottom half of the mountain isn’t in the picture

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Hm? Bottom of the picture is at 4000 m above sea level?

this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
298 points (95.4% liked)

Today I Learned (TIL)

8346 readers
1 users here now

You learn something new every day; what did you learn today?

/c/til is a community for any true knowledge that you would like to share, regardless of topic or of source.

Share your knowledge and experience!

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS