298
submitted 5 days ago by ooli3@sopuli.xyz to c/til@lemmy.ca
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] myster0n@feddit.nl 50 points 5 days ago

That's a misleading graph as it starts at 4000m

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago

I think this is more to visualize the size of the ascent on K2, rather than the true size of the mountain.

[-] ooli3@sopuli.xyz 11 points 5 days ago

at 800m the Burj is still at 1/10 of the 2nd tallest mountain.. seems big no?

[-] mech@feddit.org 9 points 5 days ago

What's misleading about it?

[-] teft@piefed.social 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

~~Everest isn’t 8000 meters from the base to peak. It’s 8000 meters at the peak but the foothills are several hundred meters high before you even get to everest. The buildings shown would have to be shown below ground if we really wanted to see them compared to everest’s height.~~

[-] mech@feddit.org 29 points 5 days ago
  1. The buildings are shown as you would see them if they were built at the base of the mountain, to show its size. The sea level is irrelevant for this illustration.
  2. This isn't Mount Everest.
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago

What's misleading?
It literally tells you the foot of the mountain is already around 4000m above sea level.

[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 24 points 5 days ago

Technical question for actual climbers.

How high up can you go by vehicle and still say you 'climbed' the mountain?

Nobody goes on foot from sea level to the top of the mountain, so at what point does the ascent start?

[-] 69420@lemmy.world 40 points 5 days ago

If you're not starting on foot from the bottom of the Mariana Trench, you're just a filthy casual.

[-] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 2 points 5 days ago

What if I'm standing on the beach but my balls are all the way inside Challenger Deep?

[-] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 3 points 5 days ago

i thought I would see a dick measuring joke but this is new

[-] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 1 points 5 days ago

come on, kiss the abyss

[-] mech@feddit.org 42 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Nobody goes on foot from sea level to the top of the mountain

Tim Macartney-Snape climbed Mount Everest that way. It took him 3 months.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Macartney-Snape#Everest:_Sea_to_Summit_Expedition

[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 19 points 5 days ago

The exception that proves the rule.

But thank you, that's pretty interesting.

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago

What rule? "Don't use absolutes"? 🤪

[-] Gobbel2000@programming.dev 14 points 5 days ago

The practical answer is: you drive as far as you legally can.

As a disclaimer, pictured here are the Himalayas, which are at a completely different scale to where I've been, but in my experience there are typically parking spaces/bus stops at the end of public roads. At this point you leave the built up infrastructure and enter nature, and these are often located in a place where the flatter valley ends and a steeper ascent begins. In many cases there are smaller private roads further up to service more remote cabins or farmsteads. Sometimes there are even taxi services that drive you further along using private roads, which can be seen as not fully scaling the mountain yourself. Generally, the closest public parking is considered the starting point and most people will therefore start at the same spot.

[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 3 points 5 days ago

I expect that by 2050 it will be common for the 0.01% to land a flying car 100 meters from the summit and then claim to have conquered the peak.

[-] moody@lemmings.world 11 points 5 days ago

For Everest in particular, Base Camp 1 is at about 4000m IIRC, and that's where ascents typically start after some time to acclimate to the already high altitude.

[-] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago

I mean you park the car in the parking lot and then you start at the trailhead. That's really as far as you're allowed to drive up, not like you can drive on the hiking trail

[-] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 4 points 5 days ago

Not a climber but I’m assuming the base of the mountain.

[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 6 points 5 days ago

I guess that's what my question is. what is considered 'the base?'

I suppose it varies for each mountain.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 days ago

Wow the Mia Khalifa is barely a dot on there. I know which one I want to get on top of.

[-] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 days ago

I was going to say I'm very impressed with those buildings actually considering how thin and scrawny they are in comparison, but then I realized 4000m of mountain height from the sea level are technically not visible in this picture.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago

Context: the foot of Mt. Everest is in itself higher than most mountains. And then on top of all that there is an actual mountain peak you can see on the pictures.

[-] BambiDiego@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

I very much enjoy the friendship and company of hobby climbers. Professional climbers are, in my experience, 10% incredible and kind people with amazing life stories, 90% self aggrandising spoiled narcissists who think they're invincible, but should instead be dead without the support of dozens of people in their lives, who have never received proper credit or even an honest humble thanks.

Most people who go to do climbs like Annapurna and Everest are already a negative in my book.

[-] dumbass@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago

Can you beat the Aggro Crag?

[-] kriz@slrpnk.net 6 points 5 days ago

This makes thebuildings more impressive to me

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Is the picture to scale in both height and width?

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 4 days ago

Which beast?

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Can't imagine the amount of force that pushed these huge mountains up, with their immeasurable mass. Wow.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Billy Brennan: So Mr. Kirby, when you climbed K2, did you base camp at twenty-five or thirty thousand feet?

Paul Kirby: Thirty thousand feet, we were pretty close to the top.

Billy Brennan: You were about a thousand feet above, actually.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
298 points (95.4% liked)

Today I Learned (TIL)

8343 readers
1 users here now

You learn something new every day; what did you learn today?

/c/til is a community for any true knowledge that you would like to share, regardless of topic or of source.

Share your knowledge and experience!

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS