148
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
148 points (98.7% liked)
Gaming
4118 readers
90 users here now
The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community
For news, discussions and memes!
Community Rules
This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:
- No NSFW content
You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.
What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:
- Respectful Communication: We strive for positive, constructive dialogue and encourage all members to engage with one another in a courteous and understanding manner.
- Inclusivity: Embracing diversity is at the core of our community. We welcome members from all walks of life and expect interactions to be conducted without discrimination.
- Privacy: Your privacy is paramount. Please respect the privacy of others just as you expect yours to be treated. Personal information should never be shared without consent.
- Integrity: We believe in the integrity of speech and action. As such, honesty is expected, and deceptive practices are strictly prohibited.
- Collaboration: Whether you're here to learn, teach, or simply engage in discussion, collaboration is key. Support your fellow members and contribute positively to shared learning and growth.
If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Assholes.
They want to make money
Sure, so does organized crime. What's your point?
Hey now, organized crime usually has an element of giving back to the community, it's much more ethical than this!
The HDMI Forum blocks open source implementations of their spec. They want to keep it closed source so they can charge whatever they want to use their standards.
Big content creators (Disney, Netflix, etc) want TV manufacturers to keep using HDMI because the standard includes a DRM protocol.
And they're allowed to. But this is not that.
I can think of a money reason to block open source implementations...
And here are those companies making that decision
https://hdmiforum.org/members/
You only need to get down the list to broadcom before it becomes obvious this isn't going to change.
so pretty much all important companies ☹️
I'm glad more people are hearing how it's this group of standards assholes who are causing it.
I don't know why the Steam Machine doesn't have DisplayPort 2.0 (release June 2019)...
Probably because it's designed to be attached to TVs, which use hdmi.
It has DP 1.4 though.
Ouch, tought it didn't have DP at all. My bad
I really wish displayport on TVs would take off.
I really wish I could buy big ass dumb monitor at the cost of a similar size smart tv.
Hollywood hates that idea.
That's the idea
How, though? I'm not terribly knowledgeable about the law, but I know interoperability is one of the major sources of exceptions to copyright protection, and the whole Google vs Oracle saga would imply there's nothing illegal about making your own implementation of a standard without permission.
AMD is a member of the HDMI consortium and is probably bound by private agreements to not make open source drivers without permission from the consortium. They did try to get them to budge but they didn't.
Copyright, patent, trademark, and trade secret laws are all entirely different and have almost nothing to do with each other (don't be fooled by the property-rights-hating shysters who try to gaslight you into lumping them all as "intellectual property[sic]").
Trademarks and patents don't have the same kinds of interoperability exceptions that copyright does, and you can't claim to "support HDMI™" without licensing rights to those in addition to whatever copyrighted code you might need for the software side of the implementation.
So what stops them from supporting HDMI™ 2.1 but just not call it that? As long as they create the code in a clean room scenario I don't see how they could be liable for damages? Although I assume it has something to with DRM.. And then you get into the weeds of the terrible cyber security laws...