45
LLMs Making Algorithms & Data Structures Obsolete
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
45 points (94.1% liked)
Programmer Humor
32576 readers
295 users here now
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
- No NSFW content.
- Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Yes. The other answer is technically correct, but yours is pragmatically correct.
If a solution is worse than O(nln(n))* then most of us are going to be looking for a pragmatic and completely alternate way to deal with it, rather than analyzing how to make it mildly less terrible.
So I'm just writing O(n^2) as a quick professional replacement for my original write in answer of "dogshit".