54

The headline here is a bit misleading, what he actually said was:

"Who's to know? [Technology firms] are spending trillions and trillions on AI and maybe it's going to produce the next War and Peace.

"And if people want to read that book, AI-generated or not, we will be selling it - as long as it doesn't pretend to [be] something that it isn't.

"We as booksellers would certainly naturally and instinctively disdain it," Daunt said.

Readers value a connection with the author "that does require a real person", he added. Any AI-generated book would always be clearly labelled as such.

My revised headline is:

Waterstones boss would rather not sell books generated by AI, but might if they are correctly labelled.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 11 points 1 day ago
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Computer based art was being used to sell books in bookstores 40 years ago.

They didn't really sell well, and now, barely anyone remembers it was a thing.

[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 3 points 13 hours ago

And that relates to a book shop selling LLM-written books how? Digital artists still draw what's attributed to them, an AI author hasn't written what's attributed to them.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world -1 points 13 hours ago

AI is a little bit more complicated than that due to the flaws that pop up in generating.

For example, here are some AI comic books that were created. What the author did was write the overall story, then used an AI prompt to create each panel of the comic.

Each panel took dozens to hundreds of attempts, out of which the author made the artistic decision to choose the best one.

https://aicomicbooks.com/

"The Lesson" is probably my favorite of the bunch, but they're free to download, check them out.

https://aicomicbooks.com/book/the-lesson-book-by-steve-coulson-download-now/

this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
54 points (96.6% liked)

United Kingdom

5610 readers
156 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS