28
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
28 points (100.0% liked)
World News
38532 readers
602 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
it looks like euroclear following through on their promise of legal action is the only thing that will carry any weight.
Given that they want to steal Russian assets because they've run out of money to fund the war, it's not clear where the money to compensate Euroclear would come from. However, that's not really even the main issue. The real risk is that Europe becomes toxic to foreign investment once they do this. Nobody in their right mind would ever park money in Europe or invest into European industry after that. The whole attempt to seize Nexperia doesn't help build confidence either. And of course, foreign money that's currently in Europe is going to flee as well which will lead to a huge financial crisis bringing us back to the question of how the EC can possibly reimburse anything.
Anyone who doesn't invade, rape, torture and pillage will still be pretty safe when investing in Europe
Clearly rape, torture, and pillaging have fuck all to do with investing in Europe given that the US is one of the biggest trading partners of Europe. Try to put a bit more effort into your artless trolling.
So then the US should avoid investing in Europe at all costs, eh?