151
Assange files criminal complaint against Nobel Foundation: Peace prize isn’t a war fund
(sweden.news-pravda.com)
News from around the world!
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
Then you sounds have cited those actual sources. Also obviously the footnotes don't work in quotes. You seriously just included a bunch of random numbers in your quote and are now acting like that makes it more credible.
I provided the link to the Wikipedia that has the sources. I'm not obligated to do anything for you.
And I actually went and checked those sources, and turns out they don't actually say what your quote says they say. No wonder you refused to quote them directly, knowing they didn't support you. (I'm just kidding: obviously you never bothered to check them. Wikipedia is religious scripture to you, divine truth, and the little blue numbers are just sigils of divine power that you never think to actually click through
So he didn't release DNC emails to make Hillary look bad? He didn't get Trump Jr to promote a lie about what Hillary said? He didn't try to use his election interference to get an ambassador position from Trump?
The only thing I was wrong about was that he had RNC emails. Russia never gave them to him.
That's not what's in your Wikipedia quote, you dishonest asshole
"So he didn’t release DNC emails to make Hillary look bad?"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/07/13/timeline-how-russian-agents-allegedly-hacked-the-dnc-and-clintons-campaign/
" He didn’t get Trump Jr to promote a lie about what Hillary said? "
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/10/no-clinton-didnt-say-she-wanted-to-drone-strike-assange.html
" He didn’t try to use his election interference to get an ambassador position from Trump?"
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/julian-assange-trump-jr-wikileaks-ambassador-offer-dm-messages-twitter-a8055021.html
The Wikipedia article I linked earlier has links to every source. I've now provided them for you.
That’s not what’s in your Wikipedia quote, you dishonest asshole
I literally quoted each and every line from my post along with the corresponding Wikipedia quote from my post AND THE SOURCE.
"The only thing I was wrong about was that he had RNC emails."
What the fuck is wrong with you?
No you didn't
I have no idea what you are arguing about.
The post that referenced Wikipedia had 3 claims with sources:
Assange released DNC emails.
Assange had Trump Jr post a lie about Hillary.
Assange asked Trump for an ambassadorship.
Which of these did I not provide sources?
I have said 2 times that I was wrong about Assange not releasing RNC emails because Russia didn't give them to him.
What exactly is the problem you are seeing?
No it didn't, don't lie
You didn't answer my question.
Because you lied
That's still not an answer to the question.
Please quote the lie.
You're welcome to read back through the thread to see the lie
Despite your constant aggression, I asked you to please quote it. If you can't do it, that makes you the liar.
No, that is not how that works
You made the assertion that I am a liar. You need to support your assertion.
I did
Repeating, "You are a liar." isn't proof. It is the assertion you need to show evidence of.
I think it's now clear you keep repeating, "You are a liar." while refusing to provide any proof is because you don't have any evidence.
You’re welcome to read back through the thread to see the lie
I can't prove what isn't there.
Only you can prove your assertion.
Ok