557
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] chaogomu@kbin.social -3 points 1 year ago

Renewables cannot be spun up. You have to massively over build to do that. And even then, you're still depending on availability of sun and wind.

If you need more power than is available, it's done with natural gas peaker plants at 10x the normal cost of electricity.

On the flip side, a stable base load of nuclear, can be spun up and down over the day to meet expected load.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

That's exactly the suggestion, over-build renewables right now to get to net zero, then fill out the generation portfolio with nuclear. The demand will only go up, so that excess renewables will eventually be used to capacity anyway. The study is laying out what the priority should be right now, when climate change has already got its foot well in the door.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Renewables can effectively be spun up or down as long as they have batteries. That way, they can usually be generating as much energy as possible regardless of demand.

[-] oo1@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

In that case it's the batteries being loaded and unloaded, not the renewables.

Storage can be connected to the grid anywhere and charged whenever power is cheap - from whatever sources are generating at that time. It is effectively an independent investment - assuming your on-grid / grid scale.

As far as i know the only major renewable electricity generation that is intrinsically linked to storage is reservoir based hydro with reverse pumping capability though even that increases costs and is a quite situation dependent if you want a lot of peaking power..

Nuclear fanboys could equally argue to add batteries so as to convert baseload into shape, or peaking.

[-] Narrrz@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

is our battery tech even up to this?

[-] abrasiveteapot@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Yes. There's numerous live examples which have been in place for years (Horndale South Australia for example)

[-] schroedingershat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. It costs less and requires less mining to use the most expensive and wasteful storage option. The only reason there aren't more is a lack of sufficient investment in VRE required to make them useful.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
557 points (91.1% liked)

World News

39167 readers
1660 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS