176
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 66 points 2 weeks ago

WE. DON'T. WANT. THIS.

Mozilla, for the love of god, stop cramming AI into the browser when the vast majority of your users just want a privacy-respecting browser that works.

I've said it before, and I've said it again: I will not donate any more money to the Mozilla foundation until they stop cramming AI into everything, and you should too.

[-] goatinspace@feddit.org 14 points 2 weeks ago

They might be getting money from google that tells them what to do.

[-] kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 weeks ago

Nah, Google funds them so they can point at them and say they aren't a monopoly, directing what they do would ruin that.

Mozilla's perfectly capable of making dumb decisions on their own, they do that plenty

[-] Eldritch@piefed.world 12 points 2 weeks ago
[-] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

Because google only pays Mozilla because of:

  • Maintaining search dominance
  • Preventing anti-monopoly scrutiny

They don't want Mozilla to compete in any AI space, because there's already a ton of competition in the AI space given how much money gets thrown around, so they don't benefit from anti-monopoly efforts, and there's so many models that they don't benefit from search dominance in the AI space. They'd much rather have Mozilla stay a non-AI browser while they get to implement AI features and show shareholders that they're "the most advanced" of them all, or that "nobody else is doing it like we do".

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

They are, but that's only for the search engine thing. Unless Google has a seat on the board.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's for the default search, but it also has the side benefit of ensuring a secondary browser with decent market share that's not Chromium-based they can point to claiming they're not a monopoly.

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

you can sign up to receive updates on our AI Window and be among the first to try it and give us feedback.

I wonder if we all sign up and tell them we don't want it if they would actually listen.

[-] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Read what the new CEO says, and it doesn't seem as bad. In the interview, he states that they'll be adding AI with options, and since they're not beholden to any one company, the user can choose what is best for them.

My guess: A sidebar chat you can disable, which allows you to pick your provider, and an about:config that let's you customize the URL for local AI.

Would I rather time be devoted elsewhere? Yes. Would this be horrible? Nah.

That being said, I could be totally wrong.

[-] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago

Is "the vast majority of your users" your display name or something? I have those turned off in my client settings

this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
176 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

78179 readers
274 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS