176
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] meejle@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago

Every product we build must give people agency in how it works. Privacy, data use, and AI must be clear and understandable. Controls must be simple. AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off. People should know why a feature works the way it does and what value they get from it.

Come on, this isn't Reddit, at least skim the article before you start with the performative outrage.

[-] CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago

It should be something that people can easily turn ON.

[-] korendian@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It is opt in, this article is click bait.

Directly from the horses mouth:

"In Firefox, you’ll never be locked into one ecosystem or have AI forced into your browsing experience. You decide when, how or whether to use it at all. You’ve already seen this approach in action through some of our latest features like the AI chatbot in the sidebar for desktop or Shake to Summarize on iOS.

Now, we’re excited to invite you to help shape the work on our next innovation: an AI Window. It’s a new, intelligent and user-controlled space we’re building in Firefox that lets you chat with an AI assistant and get help while you browse, all on your terms. Completely opt-in, you have full control, and if you try it and find it’s not for you, you can choose to switch it off."

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/ai-window/

[-] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 19 points 2 weeks ago

We'll just ignore the fact that the chat bot menu setting randomly appeared after an update. Very opt in. The only way to kill the task it sparks is to go into about:config and kill all the browser.ml.* options.

No one here cares what Firefox says because their actions have already hurt the trust in them.

[-] aloofPenguin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Do the processes still run even if you toggle the setting off?

[-] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

Just going through settings was not enough. The process was still running. I don't know which toggle fully killed it because I clicked everything off at once.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 2 weeks ago

Except I literally had to dig through the about: config settings to turn off AI in my browsing experience. So they are already lying

[-] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

I didn't. So why is that?

[-] douglasg14b@lemmy.world -5 points 2 weeks ago

Ah yes, the classic:

They must be maliciously lying instead of me using something wrong argument.

Very solid, much sound.

[-] gid@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

I can flip that around for you: "Ah yes, the classic: the user must be in the wrong, not the organisation with a history of secretly installing an extension nobody asked for".

[-] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

Any articles can be a click bait. The reality is what matters.

I didnt turn on AI in Firefox myself. It just appeared there after an update and was turned on. It is not opt in but an opt out.

[-] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's not needed. Nobody is looking for AI powered shit and they will feel it in their numbers. Why invest the pennies Mozilla can invest in a technology that big monsters are developing with billions and billions of dollars and natural resources? It's not even reasonable, like a Pocket 2.0.

[-] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Unfortunate Newsflash:

It's smaller reddit.

The lowest common denominator consumes all. And that denominator includes not being able to read articles or apply critical thought.

[-] communism@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 weeks ago

Nobody's saying it's mandatory. People don't want their web browsers to be full of bloated AI slop. Why should there be the AI components of Firefox on my hard drive if I'm never going to use them? Why should my web browser be full of low quality features I'll never use? It's enshittification. Not to mention the very quote you're pasting specifies that it's opt-out, not opt-in.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago

Few read the articles around here, like any social media. I could come with a headline that Bill Gates proposed using trans people's brains for AI processing, Matrix style, and harvesting the water of the dead ones, a la Dune. Lemmy would eat it up.

this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
176 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

78149 readers
621 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS