43

For those who aren't familiar with the term, it means believing something that probably shouldn't be believed, or being influenced to believe something that's not necessarily in your best interests.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

9/11 truther. Missile pods on military jets and fed reserve gold heist. WTC7 got me in. But I was also a welder and I'd been making thermite for fun since I was a teenager so I knew that jet fuel didn't have to melt steel beams to significantly reduce its tensile strength, just several hundred degrees was enough to weaken steel. And I know the difference between thermite products and liquid aluminium pouring from the buildings, thermite looks like straight up lava, and in any case, you need way, way more thermite to melt through a steel girder than you might expect from watching movies. It takes at least half a kilo just to melt through the hood of a car, let alone and engine block like the anarchist cookbook would have you believe, I know because I did it.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

I remember watching one of the Flash animated "truth" "documentaries" on flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon.

It talked about missiles being used and similar stuff, I was 13-14 at the time and I showed my parents, they rightfully explained that this was just a random video that anyone could have made.

They brought up the importance of using trusted sources, but also emphasized that they didn't have the facts either.

They told me to calm down and wait for verifiable facts to surface.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Yeah the Pentagon impact site never made any sense and the government was never open about the evidence. I was never convinced the official explanation made sense based upon the damage to the building.

The US government could easily clear it up by realizing the footage, but they won't.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago

It makes perfect sense to me, what issues do you see with it?

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I don't really care to talk about this unless you have researched this thoroughly because the damage to the building was always inconsistent with the official narrative including the wreckage that was extracted from the building.

This makes me skeptical and the government has never released the footage when they definitely have lots of video evidence that can demonstrate exactly what happened.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago

Ok, if you are going to play this game...

  1. Please list your qualifications for doing research on the subject.
  2. Please let me know what research you have done, understand that I expect more than just facebooking and googling.

This will let me know both were you stand and what level of discussion you expect.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Hard pass. I can already tell what you are up to. Acting like an asshole isn't the move you think it is.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

lol, calling me an asshole when you were the one who started acting all high and mighty, talking about how a normal person wouldn't understand your special research.

I won't deny that my last reply was a bit assholish, but that was just a reply to you rudely implying that normal people wasn't worth debating.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I said you were acting like one. At any rate, I know when someone is trying to troll. This is a very touchy topic for a lot of people. I apologize if I offended you.

Having spent a great deal of time studying this decades ago I really don't want to talk about it unless you are someone who has an insight. I have had thousands of conversations online and in person about this topic and frankly I am over it.

Ultimately, regardless of how much you do or don't believe the government it sidesteps the real issue. And that issue is 9/11 was used to take away our rights and start multiple needless wars of aggression.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Alright, it is absolutely fair to just be over a topic that has been talked to death and doesn't mean anything anymore.

I fully agree that the response to 9/11 was insane in terms of the US loosing freedoms, and I wonder how the country would be if that didn't happen...

[-] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Ok, I've always wondered what's up with WTC7, but I could never be bothered to wade through the noise. What was up with that?

[-] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I once watched a 9/11 truther type program that hand waved away this issue by simply stating the government used "nanothermite". What is "nanothermite"? It's thermite but acts in whatever way it needs to when somebody pokes holes in the idea of thermite.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

It takes at least half a kilo just to melt through the hood of a car

Counter argument: if you did this at home on a hobby budget, imagine what is possible with a high tech lab and a military budget.

[-] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

imagine

Not a terribly convincing start to a hypothesis.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

The start was what they achieved with no resources. Keep up.

[-] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

You are grossly overestimating military budget spending. Now, a private contractor with a government contract, on the other hand, maybe. As long as they didn't waste it and delivered on schedule. Wait, that doesn't happen either.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

IF a private contractor can hijack 4 planes in the most heavily guarded airspace in the world without scrambling a single defence fighter, then they can source Nanothermite on schedule.

Not saying that happened, but suitable explosives are not the weakest link in the 9/11 conspiracy theories.

this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
43 points (97.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

36328 readers
265 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS