127

I really do not understand his infatuation with Greenland.
Also shot (pictured above)
Chaser:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SoyViking@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago

The military argument is complete horseshit. The yanks already have unhindered military access to Greenland. In recent years they have themselves decided to scale down their military presence there to a couple of hundred people at the Thule Airbase. If they wanted to put stuff on Greenland for spying on Russia or early warning systems, the Greenlandic and Danish governments would roll up the red carpet for them.

Regarding minerals, Greenland has comprehensive environmental protections in place to protect the vulnerable Arctic enrichment. Big polluting rare earth refining facilities would not be possible under the current rules. An American invasion could put an unelected occupation government in place that would remove these protections and allow American capital to destroy Greenland for profit.

[-] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

I kind of figured we did the environmental protections like we do them in Denmark - vote them away when they're inconvenient. Nice to know Greenland is better at it

[-] Keld@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Regarding minerals, Greenland has comprehensive environmental protections in place to protect the vulnerable Arctic enrichment. Big polluting rare earth refining facilities would not be possible under the current rules.

The mining operation in Kuannersuit got interrupted over envinronmetal outrage spearheaded by IA in part because of the radioactivity, but the existing government was all for it. That's why Siumut ended up owned in 2021.

this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
127 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14245 readers
860 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS