121

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 day ago

Technically correct, but misses the point. It's the stuff of: "If you haven't thrown out your cellphone because of its links to capitalist abuse, you deserve to suffer" or something. The Nib was making fun of this years ago, with its comic about "we should improve society somewhat", "yet you participate in society, curious". Expecting individuals to voluntarily find their way to the right decisions or else they deserve to suffer has more in common with liberalism than marxism-leninism. Treating individuals as moral failures (and therefore deserving of suffering) because they haven't rejected every aspect of the society they live in, in order to fight against it, is asinine.

This isn't to take it to another extreme and be in support of having no standards at all for how people behave or who we choose to organize with (a context where this matters a lot more). It's normal to have lines drawn in the sand. But over being on Twitter? For god's sake, they're an internet poster, not a war criminal, and you aren't the same as a Nazi simply by posting on a platform that got taken over by one. That's why I made the comparison to living in the US. It's one of the most grotesque empires in human history, but that doesn't mean everyone who lives there is guilty by proxy with full awareness, complicity, and consent to its crimes. Guilt by proxy is the kind of stuff people use to (flimsily) justify genocide, not the kind of reasoning we need to be getting anywhere near. A person who lives with an abusive spouse is not the same as the abusive spouse. We need to be focused more on solutions than on ivory tower moralizing that conveniently leaves out the ways our own behaviors and associations are linked to the global system of exploitation.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Getting rid of your cellphone is also harder than leaving Xitter. Xitter isn't a vital part of society or really that important, it's literally just a place to waste time. It's actually a really easy and simple thing to do and should be encouraged.

I don't know if scolding individuals for their behavior is effective as a general strategy, I just mean to point out that it's categorically different to criticize someone for using Xitter than to criticize them for owning a cell phone or living in the US.

[-] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Twitter, whether we like it or not, is one of the most broadly used social media platforms there is, with some of the furthest reach. Calling it "just a place to waste time" is an ignorant take on it that misses how these platforms become part of communication, career, alerts, friendships, agitprop. For some people, it is "just a place to waste time." For some, it is much more.

It is technically correct that there are degrees of how "easy" these examples of things are to "quit", but as I said before, litigating over which is generally easier to "quit" is missing the point. It's also something that can be greatly influenced by background/circumstances. The US is easy to leave if you're wealthy, but the experience is going to be very different if you're poor. In fact, most things are easy to selectively "quit" if you're wealthy. It's the poor people who have to look worse for not uprooting parts of their life on a whim, while well-off people are more easily able to make choices that look conscientious on paper due to the padding they have.

We could make a chart that tries to go over easiest to hardest things to quit/leave, but it would be misleading if it didn't take into account the reasons any given person hasn't done it and the weight the given thing carries in their life. It would also be rather pointless in this context if we weren't also going over value of quitting. Performative morality isn't going to help the cause and we can't assume that leaving a thing to the fascists is automatically good because fascists are currently in charge of it. That reasoning taken to its conclusion leads to giving up. There are contexts boycotts may make a difference, if they're organized, but I don't see how people randomly choosing to not do a thing when they get around to it is going to apply consistent pressure with vocal demands.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Yeah, call me ignorant, I don't get it at all. I don't see how it's even slightly useful. It's certainly not working class people that "need" Xitter for their career, at most it's petite bourgeois content creators and influencers who need it to reach an audience. I can't imagine what a poor person could possibly need Xitter for, it makes no sense to me. I lack any context to even imagine it.

For context I'm in my 30s and never had an account. It just seemed like a place to make me mad, and that hasn't changed.

[-] sweetashyamcasserole@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 18 hours ago

For at least a few years Twitter was the place to get breaking news as it was unfolding, like during the Arab Spring. Over the past year though it has become utter shit for even that as X's algorithms push clearly right-wing slants of mostly made up culture war stories.

All that to say though that under a post about the UK government working with Zionists to beat up and jail a shitposter just because they don't like Israel, we're instead in a lengthy discussion about whether or not using the 6th most popular website on the entire internet is a mark against someone. Yes practically anyone on X can switch to another site and be better for it, yes it is incredibly easy to drop for practically everyone using that website... but this started with a comment that said he deserved state violence and a kangaroo court trial over this lol. Feels like we've moved onto a totally different, equally needless discussion while pulling focus away from what really matters

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Yeah it was the only public forum/town square of the internet. It just really isn't that anymore, and I think it really matters that people stop using Xitter. It's bad for users and bad for society. That said, you're right, it certainly isn't the highest contradiction and people don't deserve to be brutalized by pigs because they're a shitposter.

But its wack to compare leaving Xitter to leaving the US or giving up cellphones. That was my original point.

[-] sweetashyamcasserole@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 18 hours ago

Agreed, comparisons to paying taxes or giving up phones or whatnot is pretty silly haha

[-] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 17 hours ago

Okay, tell me why it is silly (while taking into account what I already said in this thread to explain the irrelevance here of rating ease of quitting things).

[-] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I can give you a pretty direct example. I remember one of the mutuals I had when I used to use twitter, they sometimes used it to ask for help with stuff, similar to how some people ask for help in mutualaid here. Twitter pre-Musk was a big part of what helped move me left politically and got me exposed to political education. When it was bent toward "mask on fascism" pre-Musk, nobody cared in the kind of way presented in this thread, like there was something wrong with you for using it. Now that the mask is off, suddenly people are terrible for being on there. It's weird.

I can't vouch for it having much to offer at this point. I haven't used it in a while and last I knew, a lot had deteriorated in being overrun by zionist bots, or just like, porn bots. But I know that even post-Musk, there were times people furthered connections and like I mentioned first, got help in one way or another.

Edit: Also, if you've never used it and evidently know very little about it in practice, maybe you shouldn't be crusading about who should or shouldn't use it?

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

You're talking about how it was useful before, but does it still apply? Seems like that was stomped out.

As for why it's different now, nobody cared because it was a space shared by fascists and antifascists. I never really used it, but was still peripherally aware enough to know that there was a left-Twitter. Similar to Reddit, the site was shared by some of the worst and best people on the internet. That's no longer the case. It's not the internet town square where users share equal space and compete for attention, it's now just a platform for Nazis and pedos by Nazis and pedos. I don't see good reasons to use it. It's a nasty habit.

Grok is stripping clothes off of children's photos and making revenge porn. It's indefensible. People need to log off.

[-] rainpizza@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

You’re talking about how it was useful before, but does it still apply? Seems like that was stomped out.

Even though anti imperialist, anti zionist and communist accounts get banned with a higher frequency, it still applies. You may have not noticed but plenty of information that I and other comrades have shared in Lemmygrad comes from Xitter. Example:

There is just too many examples but maybe you weren't aware because people already extract the good content from there and share it to comrades here.

[-] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 16 hours ago

You’re talking about how it was useful before, but does it still apply? Seems like that was stomped out.

Based on what? Vibes? You already admitted you have no experience with it.

this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
121 points (99.2% liked)

World News

3111 readers
167 users here now

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS