22
Using dash or ksh as default shell (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 days ago by mlody@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Recently I got really interested in debloating and hardening my operating systems, cause I'm heavily inspired by Unix and "worse is better" philosophy. As I heard bash is heavy and we have much more lightweight and faster alternatives like these mentioned in title. They must be great alternative for scripting and interpreting but is there any reason to use them on my machines as interactive shell? Anyone are using them? Also is it worth to learn them as bash is standard IT industry?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mlody@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I don't want to remove bash as my operating system is using it as hard dependency, I was considering using different one. I agree with you at point - installing another shell if all what I need is bash makes my system more bloated.

this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
22 points (95.8% liked)

Linux

57274 readers
493 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz