461
No rush, honey
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
461 points (92.9% liked)
Funny
15074 readers
845 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
There is no ethical consumption under capitalism
that is why i exclusively buy stuff from nestle and donate all of my leftover money to Trump and Jk Rowling
I'm just trying to get by, I buy exclusively whatever is cheapest
Then you're vegan? Because the cheapest foods are rice, beans, potatos, etc.
I'd say more towards vegetarian, but for sure.
Love this meme, was trying to sympathise with my comment tho. Didn't realise how apathetic it has come across to everyone. Oops.
Some are less unethical than others.
Indeed, the amount of slavery in the modern world's supply chains is enormous. We exploit child slaves in far away places so we can bankrupt ourselves trying to provide for our kids here at home. I dare say, it's quite the flawed system we have built for ourselves.
I don't think you understand why that phrase is used
Tell me your interpretation, my friend
Sure there is
Go on...
Most consumption under capitalism is ethical. Both parties agree on an exchange rate for services and mutually benefit.
So only two parties are involved? What about the parties who produced the thing? Built the thing? Grew the thing? Harvested the thing? Cooked the thing? Packaged the thing?
You can apply that recursively