224
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Bolshechick@hexbear.net 53 points 1 week ago

And like, even the houses are terrible and an even worse way of categorizing personality than like zodiac or Miggs Bryers.

The houses are literally main characters, losers, evil people, and smart people (except the smartest person is in the main character house).

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 47 points 1 week ago

The houses are the sort of thing where I'm not sure how much of it is bad world building and how much of it is just British.

[-] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Definitely both. I never want to read the words "head boy" again in my entire life.

[-] FumpyAer@hexbear.net 36 points 1 week ago

Such a missed opportunity to position the houses as related to aptitude in a particular type of magic. That would give them an actual character.

[-] DasRav@hexbear.net 41 points 1 week ago

Then Rowling woulda needed to think about her magic system a little more then not at all. She just made up whatever spell would suit the situation and then she mostly forgets about them. The fucking candy is more clearly defined then the spells.

[-] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 8 points 6 days ago

The spells start off as 'here's a quirky spell to make your enemy's snot turn into bats' and end up as 'here's the fiftieth version of 'gun spell''

[-] corvidenjoyer@hexbear.net 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I just realized the houses never specilized in anything other then the personality type you need to join depsite being fucking wizards. taken-seriously

What an awful writer lol.

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
224 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14257 readers
725 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS