194

Always had a suspicion, but its nice to know that you can just generally assume the worst about a technology these days.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SuperZutsuki@hexbear.net 48 points 3 days ago

How is it legal to drive a car with like 150ms of latency minimum? That's impaired driving on a completely different level.

[-] jackmaoist@hexbear.net 46 points 3 days ago

Everything's legal when a corpo does it.

[-] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

"Your honor, we used a roadside test on his ping. He was legal."

[-] Homer_Simpson@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago

They're not driving.

[-] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's definitely not a 150ms minimum.

Depending on the technology used, latency could reasonably be below 60ms. Really depends on a lot of factors.

[-] DasRav@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

How would it be anything less then 150ms between LA and the Philippines? 150ms is already assuming pretty much perfect conditions.

[-] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe it's just me interpreting 'latency' as being one-way.

[-] DasRav@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

That would make sens.e You have to factor in round-trip time because if the car sends video at 75ms to someone, even if they instantly react with zero delay, their reaction now has to travel back the same 60ms of time/distance before the car can act on it.

this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
194 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14266 readers
1031 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS