331
OOP at home: (feddit.nu)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 81 points 3 weeks ago

In over ten years of professional programming, I have never used inheritance without regretting it.

When it's the right tool, it's incredibly useful. When it's the wrong tool, and it often is, it racks up tech debt at an incredible rate.

It works great for technical constructs. E.g. A Button is a UI element. But for anything business logic related, yeah it'll suck.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Even then there's rarely a good reason to use inheritance instead of composition.

[-] red_tomato@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

And not once have I regretted removing inheritance.

[-] Supercrunchy@programming.dev 6 points 3 weeks ago

It might be nice to use in some very specific cases (e.g. addition-operation is a binary-operation AST node which is an AST node).

In most of the cases it just creates noise though, and you can usually do something different anyway to implement the same feature. For example in rust, just use enums and list all the possible cases and it's even nicer to use than inheritance.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

That's wild. What did you use it for?

[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

Some legacy Python code that already used inheritance. I had to extend it, and it was pretty infeasible to refactor the whole thing to not use inheritance. Not sure if I technically regretted that decision, but it was definitely painful, since Python inheritance makes it really hard to follow program control flow.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

Non typed inheritance, what could go wrong eh. You can just 'add' a function to a class dynamically in python, that is so bad.

Done any C++ classes & inheritance?

[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

It was actually typed. Python had type annotations at the time.

I only wrote C++ very early in my career so I don't remember much, but I'm sure I at least tried some inheritance in toy games I would write. All of that code was trash though by my standards today.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

Still does, but you don't have to.

So you haven't had much experience with oop?

[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

I have used OOP design patterns many times, but that doesn't mean I use inheritance a lot. I almost always reach for interfaces instead.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Well then I understand why inheritance isn't your thing, I yet have to see an interface in need of inheritance.

[-] kalpol@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago

This applies to firewall rules too

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 3 weeks ago

Do you include "traits" and "interfaces" under the title "inheritance"?

[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

No because those are different things.

[-] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Just don't use inheritance where more than a few descendants are predicted

this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
331 points (95.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

30236 readers
653 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS