60

n/t

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] unmagical@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 days ago

Why should one's labor define them? I am not identified by my profession as I'm a multifaceted individual. I do the work of my profession and I own my side projects.

[-] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's the difference between describing an occupation and LARPing as a "small business owner". Unless you employ others, it's just your labor and IMO describing yourself as a "business owner" in that situation is bourgeois mentality. It could be "I work as a pet photographer" if you prefer.

[-] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I don't think "there is a class difference between those who are self-employed and those who employ others and describing both as business owners only flattens that difference" is a reach. Describing oneself as a business owner instead of a laborer when doing freelance labor is an example of the tendency of the lowest of the petty bourgeois to try to liken themselves to the "haute" bourgeoisie.

I am attempting to explain what OP said in the title.

people's brains are so addled by capitalism that people who take pictures of people's pets for a living will tell you that they have a "pet photography business"

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
60 points (98.4% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14282 readers
676 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS